These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17361154)
21. The PhyloCode and the distinction between taxonomy and nomenclature. Queiroz Kd Syst Biol; 2006 Feb; 55(1):160-2. PubMed ID: 16507533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Taxonomy-based partitioning of the Gene Ontology. Kuśnierczyk W J Biomed Inform; 2008 Apr; 41(2):282-92. PubMed ID: 17921072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Species Names in the PhyloCode: the approach adopted by the International Society for Phylogenetic Nomenclature. Dayrat B; Cantino PD; Clarke JA; de Queiroz K Syst Biol; 2008 Jun; 57(3):507-14. PubMed ID: 18570043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Biodiversity data are out of local taxonomists' reach. Agosti D Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7075):392. PubMed ID: 16437089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. What's in a PhyloCode name? Kress WJ; DePriest P Science; 2001 Apr; 292(5514):52. PubMed ID: 11294213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Time for change in taxonomy. Bremer K; Bremer B; Karis PO; Källersjö M Nature; 1990 Jan; 343(6255):202. PubMed ID: 2300161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Recommendations for the classification and nomenclature of the DNA-beta satellites of begomoviruses. Briddon RW; Brown JK; Moriones E; Stanley J; Zerbini M; Zhou X; Fauquet CM Arch Virol; 2008; 153(4):763-81. PubMed ID: 18247103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Taxonomic proposals on the Web: new ICTV consultative procedures. Mayo MA; Fauquet CM; Maniloff J Arch Virol; 2003 Mar; 148(3):609-11. PubMed ID: 12607111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Concept of a bacterium still valid in prokaryote debate. Cavalier-Smith T Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7133):257. PubMed ID: 17361157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Challenges for taxonomy. Godfray HC Nature; 2002 May; 417(6884):17-9. PubMed ID: 11986643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Revisiting the code: clarifying name-bearing types for photomicrographs of protozoa. Duszynski DW J Parasitol; 1999 Aug; 85(4):769-70. PubMed ID: 10461969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Switzerland's role as a hotspot of type specimens. Agosti D; Linder P; Burckhardt D; Martinez S; Löbl I; Loizeau PA Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6926):889. PubMed ID: 12606969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Eroding precision in scientific communications: contagion from "the real world". Lyles A Clin Ther; 2007 Jan; 29(1):182. PubMed ID: 17379059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Should we alter the way that authorship of a subspecies name that is automatically created under Rule 40d of the Bacteriological Code is cited? Tindall BJ; Garrity GM Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 58(Pt 8):1991-2. PubMed ID: 18676496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clarifying rule 24a of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria. Tindall BJ Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 58(Pt 7):1779-81. PubMed ID: 18599736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Population, species, deme and demogensis]. Krasilov VA Zh Obshch Biol; 1976; 37(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 983327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]