BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17362400)

  • 1. Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards.
    Siegrist M; Keller C; Kastenholz H; Frey S; Wiek A
    Risk Anal; 2007 Feb; 27(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 17362400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging.
    Siegrist M; Stampfli N; Kastenholz H; Keller C
    Appetite; 2008 Sep; 51(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 18406006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology.
    Savadori L; Savio S; Nicotra E; Rumiati R; Finucane M; Slovic P
    Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1289-99. PubMed ID: 15563295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new look at the psychometric paradigm of perception of hazards.
    Siegrist M; Keller C; Kiers HA
    Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):211-22. PubMed ID: 15787770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of knowledge and misconceptions on benefit and risk perception of CCS.
    Wallquist L; Visschers VH; Siegrist M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 44(17):6557-62. PubMed ID: 20681511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lay people's perception of food hazards: comparing aggregated data and individual data.
    Siegrist M; Keller C; Kiers HA
    Appetite; 2006 Nov; 47(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 16828198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aggregate, disaggregate, and hybrid analyses of ecological risk perceptions.
    Willis HH; DeKay ML; Fischhoff B; Morgan MG
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):405-28. PubMed ID: 15876214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vulnerability and social justice as factors in emergent U.S. nanotechnology risk perceptions.
    Conti J; Satterfield T; Harthorn BH
    Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1734-48. PubMed ID: 21453374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do you know what I mean? Laypeople and experts' concepts of cognition.
    Schoo LA; van den Berg E; van Zandvoort MJ; Postma A
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2012 Mar; 27(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 22294287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hazard perception, risk perception, and the need for decontamination by residents exposed to soil pollution: the role of sustainability and the limits of expert knowledge.
    Vandermoere F
    Risk Anal; 2008 Apr; 28(2):387-98. PubMed ID: 18419656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceived risks from radiation and nuclear testing near Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan: a comparison between physicians, scientists, and the public.
    Purvis-Roberts KL; Werner CA; Frank I
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 17511698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Major psychological factors affecting acceptance of gene-recombination technology.
    Tanaka Y
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1575-83. PubMed ID: 15660613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fairness and nanotechnology concern.
    McComas KA; Besley JC
    Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1749-61. PubMed ID: 21883336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk Prioritization in the Food Domain Using Deliberative and Survey Methods: Differences between Experts and Laypeople.
    Siegrist M; Hübner P; Hartmann C
    Risk Anal; 2018 Mar; 38(3):504-524. PubMed ID: 28675477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trust in scientific experts on obesity: implications for awareness and behavior change.
    Bleich S; Blendon R; Adams A
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2007 Aug; 15(8):2145-56. PubMed ID: 17712134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laypeople's conceptions of wisdom and its development: cognitive and integrative views.
    Glück J; Bluck S
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2011 May; 66(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 21398417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Labeling of nanotechnology consumer products can influence risk and benefit perceptions.
    Siegrist M; Keller C
    Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1762-9. PubMed ID: 22084863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What drives public acceptance of nanotechnology?
    Currall SC; King EB; Lane N; Madera J; Turner S
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2006 Dec; 1(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 18654170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lay and expert interpretations of cancer cluster evidence.
    Levy AG; Weinstein N; Kidney E; Scheld S; Guarnaccia P
    Risk Anal; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1531-8. PubMed ID: 18795998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceiving others' perceptions of risk: still a task for Sisyphus.
    Finkel AM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():121-37. PubMed ID: 18469220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.