273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17362400)
21. Perceiving others' perceptions of risk: still a task for Sisyphus.
Finkel AM
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():121-37. PubMed ID: 18469220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of risk-propensity in the risky driving of younger drivers.
Hatfield J; Fernandes R
Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Jan; 41(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 19114134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Annoyance and health symptoms and their influencing factors: a population-based air pollution intervention study.
Stenlund T; Lidén E; Andersson K; Garvill J; Nordin S
Public Health; 2009 Apr; 123(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 19344922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Risky business: perceived behavior of local scientists and community support for their research.
McComas KA; Besley JC; Yang Z
Risk Anal; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1539-52. PubMed ID: 18808391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Characterization and quantification of the skin radiance through new digital image analysis.
Baret M; Bensimon N; Coronel S; Ventura S; Nicolas-Garcia S; Korichi R; Gazano G
Skin Res Technol; 2006 Nov; 12(4):254-60. PubMed ID: 17026656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. How accurately does the public perceive differences in transport risks? An exploratory analysis of scales representing perceived risk.
Elvik R; Bjørnskau T
Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Nov; 37(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 16054102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. System perspectives of experts and farmers regarding the role of livelihood assets in risk perception: results from the structured mental model approach.
Schoell R; Binder CR
Risk Anal; 2009 Feb; 29(2):205-22. PubMed ID: 19000068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Measuring Laypeople's Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI).
Hendriks F; Kienhues D; Bromme R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139309. PubMed ID: 26474078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust.
Siegrist M; Cousin ME; Kastenholz H; Wiek A
Appetite; 2007 Sep; 49(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 17442455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An inquiry of the opinions of the French and Belgian populations as regards risk.
Carlé B; Charron S; Milochevitch A; Hardeman F
J Hazard Mater; 2004 Jul; 111(1-3):21-7. PubMed ID: 15231344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Risks and nanotechnology: the public is more concerned than experts and industry.
Siegrist M; Wiek A; Helland A; Kastenholz H
Nat Nanotechnol; 2007 Feb; 2(2):67. PubMed ID: 18654213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Sex differences in perceived risks, distrust, and willingness to participate in clinical trials: a randomized study of cardiovascular prevention trials.
Ding EL; Powe NR; Manson JE; Sherber NS; Braunstein JB
Arch Intern Med; 2007 May; 167(9):905-12. PubMed ID: 17502531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Competence-based and integrity-based trust as predictors of acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS).
Terwel BW; Harinck F; Ellemers N; Daamen DD
Risk Anal; 2009 Aug; 29(8):1129-40. PubMed ID: 19572967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An empirical test of the materialist framework for understanding the general population's reaction to nonpersonalized genetic health messages.
Smerecnik CM; Mesters I; de Vries H; de Vries NK
J Health Commun; 2011 May; 16(5):550-62. PubMed ID: 21347948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The roles of group membership, beliefs, and norms in ecological risk perception.
Willis HH; Dekay ML
Risk Anal; 2007 Oct; 27(5):1365-80. PubMed ID: 18076502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How does the general public evaluate risk information? The impact of associations with other risks.
Visschers VH; Meertens RM; Passchier WF; Devries NK
Risk Anal; 2007 Jun; 27(3):715-27. PubMed ID: 17640218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Forecasting from ignorance: the use and usefulness of recognition in lay predictions of sports events.
Pachur T; Biele G
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 16904059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk.
Lazo JK; Kinnell JC; Fisher A
Risk Anal; 2000 Apr; 20(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 10859779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Social contagion of risk perceptions in environmental management networks.
Muter BA; Gore ML; Riley SJ
Risk Anal; 2013 Aug; 33(8):1489-99. PubMed ID: 23231537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Will nanotechnology make the world a better place?
Parr D
Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):395-8. PubMed ID: 15967522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
