These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17362420)

  • 1. An investigation of tooth/implant-supported fixed prosthesis designs with two different stress analysis methods: an in vitro study.
    Ozçelik T; Ersoy AE
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 17362420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative stress analyses of fixed free-end osseointegrated prostheses using the finite element method.
    Melo C; Matsushita Y; Koyano K; Hirowatari H; Suetsugu T
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 8699521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces.
    Lin CL; Wang JC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 12814307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses.
    Akpinar I; Demirel F; Parnas L; Sahin S
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9063207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical interactions of an implant/tooth-supported system under different periodontal supports and number of splinted teeth with rigid and non-rigid connections.
    Lin CL; Chang SH; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    J Dent; 2006 Oct; 34(9):682-91. PubMed ID: 16439048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
    Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical effects of implant-tooth rigid connection by a fixed partial denture: a 3d finite element analysis.
    Naveau A; Pierrisnard L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Sep; 17(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 19839184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of two different collar structured implants supporting 3-unit fixed partial denture: a 3-D FEM study.
    Meriç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; Ozden AU
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Jan; 70(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 21732740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Nickenig HJ; Schäfer C; Spiekermann H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 16958689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface.
    Canay S; Akça K
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 19509534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption related to biologic width: a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment configurations.
    Rodríguez-Ciurana X; Vela-Nebot X; Segalà-Torres M; Rodado-Alonso C; Méndez-Blanco V; Mata-Bugueroles M
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Oct; 29(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 19888491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 15248884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of dental implant cross-sectional design on cortical bone structure using finite element analysis.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; El-Maaytah M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18031443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Investigation of Three types of Tooth Implant Supported Fixed Prosthesis Designs with 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Koosha S; Mirhashemi FS
    J Dent (Tehran); 2013 Jan; 10(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 23724203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of stress induced by implant type, number of splinted teeth, and variations in periodontal support in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures: a non-linear finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang SH; Chen ST
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 20059424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.