These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17362420)

  • 21. Efficacy of the intramobile connector in implant tooth-supported fixed prostheses: an experimental stress analysis.
    Uysal H; Iplikcioğlu H; Avci M; Bilir OG; Kural O
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 8957873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of vertical interarch space and abutment height on stress distributions: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Naveau A; Renault P; Pierrisnard L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Jun; 17(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 19645311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments.
    Ochiai KT; Ozawa S; Caputo AA; Nishimura RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 12806328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An experimental analysis of the stresses on the implant in an implant-tooth-supported prosthesis: a technical note.
    Uysal H; Iplikçioğlu H; Avci M; Gündüz Bilir O; Kural O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 9048464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
    Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Numerical simulation on the biomechanical interactions of tooth/implant-supported system under various occlusal forces with rigid/non-rigid connections.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Kuo YC
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(3):453-63. PubMed ID: 16389085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.
    Asvanund P; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Oct; 106(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21962585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths.
    Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Pera F; Menini M; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 19149073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Finite-element analysis of stress on dental implant prosthesis.
    Rubo JH; Capello Souza EA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 19220846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation.
    Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Photoelastic stress analysis of natural teeth and three osseointegrated implant designs.
    Deines DN; Eick JD; Cobb CM; Bowles CQ; Johnson CM
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Dec; 13(6):540-9. PubMed ID: 8181914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19884034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the influence of location of osseointegrated implants associated with mandibular removable partial dentures.
    Cunha LD; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Pereira JA
    Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):278-87. PubMed ID: 18784528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factorial analysis of variables influencing mechanical characteristics of a single tooth implant placed in the maxilla using finite element analysis and the statistics-based Taguchi method.
    Lin CL; Chang SH; Chang WJ; Kuo YC
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Oct; 115(5):408-16. PubMed ID: 17850430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
    Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.