These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17363106)

  • 21. Multicellular behaviour and production of a wide variety of toxic substances support usage of Bacillus subtilis as a powerful biocontrol agent.
    Nagórska K; Bikowski M; Obuchowski M
    Acta Biochim Pol; 2007; 54(3):495-508. PubMed ID: 17882321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Current procedures of the integrated urban vector-mosquito control as an example in Cotonou (Benin, West Africa) and Wrocław area (Poland).
    Rydzanicz K; Lonc E; Becker N
    Wiad Parazytol; 2009; 55(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 20209805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can field-scale habitat diversification enhance the biocontrol potential of spiders?
    Samu F
    Pest Manag Sci; 2003 Apr; 59(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 12701705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens.
    Mitchell CE; Power AG
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6923):625-7. PubMed ID: 12571594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Myths, models and mitigation of resistance to pesticides.
    Hoy MA
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Oct; 353(1376):1787-95. PubMed ID: 10021775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Invasive species research in the United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service.
    Carruthers RI
    Pest Manag Sci; 2003; 59(6-7):827-34. PubMed ID: 12846333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How to better predict long-term benefits and risks in weed biocontrol: an evolutionary perspective.
    Müller-Schärer H; Bouchemousse S; Litto M; McEvoy PB; Roderick GK; Sun Y
    Curr Opin Insect Sci; 2020 Apr; 38():84-91. PubMed ID: 32240967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tailoring biocontrol to maximize top-down effects: on the importance of underlying site fertility.
    Hovick SM; Carson WP
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Jan; 25(1):125-39. PubMed ID: 26255362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Four-trophic level food webs reveal the cascading impacts of an invasive plant targeted for biocontrol.
    López-Núñez FA; Heleno RH; Ribeiro S; Marchante H; Marchante E
    Ecology; 2017 Mar; 98(3):782-793. PubMed ID: 27987302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Phytophagous arthropods of invasive swallow-wort vines (Vincetoxicum spp.) in New York.
    Milbrath LR
    Environ Entomol; 2010 Feb; 39(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 20146841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of four geographic sources of the biocontrol agent Prokelisia marginata (Homoptera: Delphacidae) following introduction into a common environment.
    Grevstad FS; O'Casey C; Katz ML
    Environ Entomol; 2012 Jun; 41(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 22732601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predicting direct and indirect non-target impacts of biocontrol agents using machine-learning approaches.
    Kotula HJ; Peralta G; Frost CM; Todd JH; Tylianakis JM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252448. PubMed ID: 34061885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. New urban trees/pests interactions in Europe.
    Rabasse JM
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt B):339-46. PubMed ID: 17385499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Natural enemies act faster than endophytic fungi in population control of cereal aphids.
    Härri SA; Krauss J; Müller CB
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 May; 77(3):605-11. PubMed ID: 18312338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of predator and prey dispersal on success or failure of biological control.
    Tang S; Cheke RA; Xiao Y
    Bull Math Biol; 2009 Nov; 71(8):2025-47. PubMed ID: 19562416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biological control of weeds.
    McFadyen RE
    Annu Rev Entomol; 1998; 43():369-93. PubMed ID: 15012395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Control of introduced species using Trojan sex chromosomes.
    Cotton S; Wedekind C
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2007 Sep; 22(9):441-3. PubMed ID: 17640769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effectiveness of predators and parasitoids for the natural control of Diuraphis noxia (Homoptera: Aphididae) on barley in central Ethiopia.
    Adisu B; Freier B; Büttner C
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2003; 68(4 Pt A):179-88. PubMed ID: 15149108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modeling population dynamics, landscape structure, and management decisions for controlling the spread of invasive plants.
    Caplat P; Coutts S; Buckley YM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2012 Feb; 1249():72-83. PubMed ID: 22239680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A review of fungal antagonists of powdery mildews and their potential as biocontrol agents.
    Kiss L
    Pest Manag Sci; 2003 Apr; 59(4):475-83. PubMed ID: 12701710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.