These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17363135)

  • 61. A novel approach in environmental valuation methods.
    Zendehdel K; De Keyser W; Van Huylenbroeck G
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(1):231-3. PubMed ID: 17191512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Social valuation and punishment assignment in transgressions of environment protection laws].
    Martín AM; Hernández B; Hess S; Suárez E; Salazar-Laplace ME; Ruiz C
    Psicothema; 2008 Feb; 20(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 18206070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Controlling groundwater pumping online.
    Zekri S
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3581-8. PubMed ID: 19674830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Individual behavior depending on reinforcement prediction errors and environmental uncertainty].
    Grigor'ian GA; Merzhanova GKh
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2008; 58(4):408-22. PubMed ID: 18825939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The costs and benefits of a migratory species under different management schemes.
    Skonhoft A
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Jul; 76(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 15939129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Does the Coase theorem hold in real markets? An application to the negotiations between waterworks and farmers in Denmark.
    Abildtrup J; Jensen F; Dubgaard A
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Jan; 93(1):169-76. PubMed ID: 22054583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Do we know how to set decision thresholds for diabetes?
    Ben-Haim Y; Zacksenhouse M; Keren C; Dacso CC
    Med Hypotheses; 2009 Aug; 73(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 19349125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Optimal sample size determinations from an industry perspective based on the expected value of information.
    Willan AR
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 19029207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol.
    Joseph LN; Maloney RF; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 19183202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Improving cross-sector policy integration and cooperation in support of freshwater conservation.
    Roux DJ; Ashton PJ; Nel JL; Mackay HM
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1382-7. PubMed ID: 18983603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Application of the US decision support tool for materials and waste management.
    Thorneloe SA; Weitz K; Jambeck J
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):1006-20. PubMed ID: 17433663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Uncertainty: cause or effect of stakeholders' debates? Analysis of a case study: the risk for honeybees of the insecticide Gaucho.
    Maxim L; van der Sluijs JP
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Apr; 376(1-3):1-17. PubMed ID: 17307234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Bringing social standards into project evaluation under dynamic uncertainty.
    Knudsen OK; Scandizzo PL
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):457-66. PubMed ID: 15876217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Life cycle assessment of a national policy proposal - the case of a Swedish waste incineration tax.
    Björklund AE; Finnveden G
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):1046-58. PubMed ID: 17419045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Justifying decisions in social dilemmas: justification pressures and tacit coordination under environmental uncertainty.
    de Kwaadsteniet EW; van Dijk E; Wit A; De Cremer D; de Rooij M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1648-60. PubMed ID: 18000100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Globalisation, environmental harm, and progress: the role of consensus and liability.
    Zandvoort H
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):43-50. PubMed ID: 16304933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Managing the risk of uncertain threshold responses: comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches.
    Lempert RJ; Collins MT
    Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):1009-26. PubMed ID: 17958508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Environmental protection, the economy, and jobs: national and regional analyses.
    Bezdek RH; Wendling RM; Diperna P
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Jan; 86(1):63-79. PubMed ID: 17234329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. UK peatland restoration: some economic arithmetic.
    Moxey A; Moran D
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jun; 484():114-20. PubMed ID: 24691211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Cost-effective abatement of non-point source nitrogen emissions - The effects of uncertainty in retention.
    Hasler B; Hansen LB; Andersen HE; Termansen M
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 246():909-919. PubMed ID: 31279248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.