These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17363446)

  • 1. In vivo characterization of the mechanics of human uterine cervices.
    Bauer M; Mazza E; Nava A; Zeck W; Eder M; Bajka M; Cacho F; Lang U; Holzapfel GA
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Apr; 1101():186-202. PubMed ID: 17363446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the in vivo biomechanical properties of the human uterine cervix in pregnancy using the aspiration test: a feasibility study.
    Bauer M; Mazza E; Jabareen M; Sultan L; Bajka M; Lang U; Zimmermann R; Holzapfel GA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 May; 144 Suppl 1():S77-81. PubMed ID: 19285777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical properties of the human uterine cervix: an in vivo study.
    Mazza E; Nava A; Bauer M; Winter R; Bajka M; Holzapfel GA
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Apr; 10(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 16143559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Connective tissue changes in the cervix during normal pregnancy and pregnancy complicated by cervical incompetence.
    Rechberger T; Uldbjerg N; Oxlund H
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Apr; 71(4):563-7. PubMed ID: 3353047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a device for objective determination of cervical consistency: a pilot study of device's validity on uterine specimens obtained by total abdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine disease.
    Predanic M
    J Perinat Med; 2002; 30(5):364-6. PubMed ID: 12442598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examination of the uterine cervix by ultrasound in normal and pathologic pregnancy.
    Lampé L; Tóth Z; Kóródi I; Ditrói P
    Acta Med Hung; 1986; 43(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 3295742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in cervical resistance and collagen fluorescence during gestation in rats.
    Shi L; Shi SQ; Saade GR; Chwalisz K; Garfield RE
    J Perinat Med; 1999; 27(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 10503180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of the elastic properties of the cervix.
    Kiwi R; Neuman MR; Merkatz IR; Selim MA; Lysikiewicz A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Apr; 71(4):568-74. PubMed ID: 3353048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical ripening and insufficiency: from biochemical and molecular studies to in vivo clinical examination.
    Schlembach D; Mackay L; Shi L; Maner WL; Garfield RE; Maul H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 May; 144 Suppl 1():S70-6. PubMed ID: 19303692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The changes of cervix uteri in pregnancy.
    Budínská MB
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1972 Mar; 3(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 4679723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of biomechanical properties in vivo in human uterine cervix.
    Liao D; Hee L; Sandager P; Uldbjerg N; Gregersen H
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Nov; 39():27-37. PubMed ID: 25084120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical and biomechanical characteristics of rat cervical ripening are not consistent with increased collagenase activity.
    Buhimschi IA; Dussably L; Buhimschi CS; Ahmed A; Weiner CP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1695-704. PubMed ID: 15547544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro analysis of muscular contractile ability and passive biomechanical properties of uterine cervical samples from nonpregnant women.
    Petersen LK; Oxlund H; Uldbjerg N; Forman A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):772-6. PubMed ID: 2014094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preterm labour. Cervical function and prematurity.
    Norman JE
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):791-806. PubMed ID: 17490914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrical impedance spectroscopy of the cervix in non-pregnant and pregnant women.
    Gandhi SV; Walker D; Milnes P; Mukherjee S; Brown BH; Anumba DO
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Dec; 129(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16517044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overview of the methods available for biomechanical testing of the uterine cervix in vivo.
    Hee L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Dec; 93(12):1219-37. PubMed ID: 25174701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical collagen and biomechanical strength in non-pregnant women with a history of cervical insufficiency.
    Oxlund BS; Ørtoft G; Brüel A; Danielsen CC; Oxlund H; Uldbjerg N
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2010 Jul; 8():92. PubMed ID: 20673361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo assessment of the biomechanical properties of the uterine cervix in pregnancy.
    Mazza E; Parra-Saavedra M; Bajka M; Gratacos E; Nicolaides K; Deprest J
    Prenat Diagn; 2014 Jan; 34(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 24155152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical etiology of spontaneous preterm birth.
    Vink J; Feltovich H
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Apr; 21(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 26776146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A continuous fiber distribution material model for human cervical tissue.
    Myers KM; Hendon CP; Gan Y; Yao W; Yoshida K; Fernandez M; Vink J; Wapner RJ
    J Biomech; 2015 Jun; 48(9):1533-40. PubMed ID: 25817474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.