These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17363787)
1. Australia shows benefits of an independent tribunal. Arnold PC BMJ; 2007 Mar; 334(7593):549. PubMed ID: 17363787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hospitals as comprehensive evaluators of physicians' competence. Volpintesta EJ Conn Med; 2010; 74(6):355. PubMed ID: 20648845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing fitness to practise: common sense approach to revalidation/accreditation. Joseph AE BMJ; 2006 Feb; 332(7538):424. PubMed ID: 16484276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing fitness to practise: revalidation is a long and winding road. Conlon M BMJ; 2006 Feb; 332(7538):424-5. PubMed ID: 16484275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Developing standards, criteria, and thresholds to assess fitness to practise. Baker R BMJ; 2006 Jan; 332(7535):230-2. PubMed ID: 16439405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defining the scope of physician competence. Porterfield JD Hosp Med Staff; 1976 Aug; 5(8):14-7. PubMed ID: 1022755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Self regulation must be made to work. Dauphinee WD BMJ; 2005 Jun; 330(7504):1385-7. PubMed ID: 15947404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accreditation standards of DO- and MD-granting medical schools: an incomplete comparison. Hunt D; Barzansky B; Sabalis R Acad Med; 2010 Jan; 85(1):3; author reply 3-4. PubMed ID: 20042807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of clinical laboratories--assurance of their quality and competence]. Kawai T Rinsho Byori; 2007 Jan; 55(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 17319492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. GMC launches new tribunal service for UK doctors. Dyer C BMJ; 2012 Jun; 344():e4060. PubMed ID: 22689895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulation and revalidation of doctors. Pringle M BMJ; 2006 Jul; 333(7560):161-2. PubMed ID: 16858022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An Australian model for professional standards. Cowell SF; Rinks M; Egan IF; Dowd SB Radiol Technol; 1996; 68(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 8880969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulation and revalidation of doctors: dangers and opportunities. Keighley BD BMJ; 2006 Aug; 333(7562):303. PubMed ID: 16888310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulation and revalidation of doctors: summary of other responses. Twisselmann B BMJ; 2006 Aug; 333(7562):303-4. PubMed ID: 16888309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Time for radical reform. Walshe K; Benson L BMJ; 2005 Jun; 330(7506):1504-6. PubMed ID: 15976427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recommendations on sub-speciality accreditation in cardiology: The Coordination Task Force on Sub-speciality Accreditation of the European Board for the Speciality of Cardiology. Lopez-Sendon J; Mills P; Weber H; Michels R; Di Mario C; Filippatos GS; Heras M; Fox K; Merino J; Pennell DJ; Sochor H; Ortoli J; ; Szatmari A; Pinto F; Amlie JP; Oto A; Lainscak M; Fox K; Kearney P; Gonçalves L; Huikuri H; Carrera C Eur Heart J; 2007 Sep; 28(17):2163-71. PubMed ID: 17675313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The implications of quality assurance in Australia. Wilson LL N Z Med J; 1981 Sep; 94(691):181-4. PubMed ID: 6945511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. All UK doctors to be required to prove competence. Kmietowicz Z BMJ; 1999 Feb; 318(7182):482. PubMed ID: 10094529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]