These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17365051)

  • 1. Prediction of hearing thresholds: comparison of cortical evoked response audiometry and auditory steady state response audiometry techniques.
    Yeung KN; Wong LL
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17365051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison between auditory steady-state response and 40 Hz auditory event related potential in the evaluation of hearing thresholds].
    Li XP; Wei W; Wu J; Lü J; Situ HR
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 25(4):263-6. PubMed ID: 19788074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory steady-state responses to bone conduction stimuli in children with hearing loss.
    Swanepoel de W; Ebrahim S; Friedland P; Swanepoel A; Pottas L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 72(12):1861-71. PubMed ID: 18963045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects.
    Tomlin D; Rance G; Graydon K; Tsialios I
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):580-8. PubMed ID: 17062499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.
    Johnson TA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):559-76. PubMed ID: 16377993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory steady-state responses for children with severe to profound hearing loss.
    Swanepoel D; Hugo R; Roode R
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):531-5. PubMed ID: 15148172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Steady-state response audiometry in a group of patients with steeply sloping sensorineural hearing loss.
    Ballay C; Tonini R; Waninger T; Yoon C; Manolidis S
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jul; 115(7):1243-6. PubMed ID: 15995514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The correlativity between the threshold acquired with ASSR and PTA].
    Yang XP; Fan LH; Zhou XR
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 24(5):321-4. PubMed ID: 18979911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Threshold estimation in children using auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli.
    Han D; Mo L; Liu H; Chen J; Huang L
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2006; 68(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 16428896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of residual hearing in cochlear implants candidates using auditory steady-state response.
    Ramos HF; Grasel SS; Beck RM; Takahashi-Ramos MT; Ramos BF; de Almeida ER; Bento RF; de Brito Neto R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 Mar; 135(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 25649884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ASSR: clinical application in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants and adults, comparison with the click-evoked ABR and pure-tone audiometry.
    Scherf F; Brokx J; Wuyts FL; Van de Heyning PH
    Int J Audiol; 2006 May; 45(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 16717018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state responses in evaluating the hearing thresholds of occupational noise-exposed workers.
    Hsu RF; Chen SS; Lu SN; Ho CK; Lin HF
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2011 Aug; 27(8):330-5. PubMed ID: 21802644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and tone-burst auditory brainstem responses in normal babies.
    Rance G; Tomlin D; Rickards FW
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):751-62. PubMed ID: 17086084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons of auditory steady state response and behavioral air conduction and bone conduction thresholds for infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Casey KA; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 24569693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and accuracy of electric response audiometry using the auditory steady-state response: evaluation in an empirical design.
    Kaf WA; Durrant JD; Sabo DL; Robert Boston J; Taubman LB; Kovacyk K
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):211-23. PubMed ID: 16684702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory sensitivity in children using the auditory steady-state response.
    Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Burg LS; Wackym PA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):536-40. PubMed ID: 15148173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16672791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The progress in the study on auditory evoked potentials].
    Chen F; Yang XP; Fan LH
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 27(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 21899015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.