These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17366306)

  • 1. Interference between cues of the same outcome depends on the causal interpretation of the events.
    Cobos PL; López FJ; Luque D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):369-86. PubMed ID: 17366306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extinction in human learning and memory.
    Scully AL; Mitchell CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1472-8. PubMed ID: 18609395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure.
    Vadillo MA; Matute H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):433-47. PubMed ID: 17366310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
    Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The experimental task influences cue competition in human causal learning.
    Melchers KG; Ungör M; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 16248733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.
    Booth SL; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17366307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements.
    De Houwer J; Vandorpe S; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):418-32. PubMed ID: 17366309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forward blocking in human learning sometimes reflects the failure to encode a cue-outcome relationship.
    Mitchell CJ; Lovibond PF; Minard E; Lavis Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):830-44. PubMed ID: 16608749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships.
    Mitchell CJ; Killedar A; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 16248728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome maximality and additivity training also influence cue competition in causal learning when learning involves many cues and events.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 17366305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interference between cues of the same outcome in a non-causally framed scenario.
    Luque D; Morís J; Cobos PL; López FJ
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):328-32. PubMed ID: 19070656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Go with the flow: How to master a nonlinear multiple-cue judgment task.
    Olsson AC; Enkvist T; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1371-84. PubMed ID: 17087590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):99-140. PubMed ID: 16095042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):234-46. PubMed ID: 16405898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: a challenge for comparator theory.
    Melchers KG; Lachnit H; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):25-53. PubMed ID: 14690848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human judgments of positive and negative causal chains.
    Baetu I; Baker AG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 19364225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Backward blocking: the role of within-compound associations and interference between cues trained apart.
    Vadillo MA; Castro L; Matute H; Wasserman EA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 17886193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Additivity pretraining and cue competition effects: developmental evidence for a reasoning-based account of causal learning.
    Simms V; McCormack T; Beckers T
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Apr; 38(2):180-90. PubMed ID: 22329707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relative effect of cue interaction.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Aug; 56(3):279-300. PubMed ID: 12881163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.