These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17367204)

  • 1. Measures of clade confidence do not correlate with accuracy of phylogenetic trees.
    Hall BG; Salipante SJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2007 Mar; 3(3):e51. PubMed ID: 17367204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of protein sequence data under relative branch-length differences and model violation.
    Mar JC; Harlow TJ; Ragan MA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 15676079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny.
    Yang Z; Rannala B
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):455-70. PubMed ID: 16012111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of branch length uncertainty on Bayesian posterior probabilities for phylogenetic hypotheses.
    Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Sep; 24(9):2108-18. PubMed ID: 17636043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability.
    Douady CJ; Delsuc F; Boucher Y; Doolittle WF; Douzery EJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Feb; 20(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 12598692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case.
    Cummings MP; Handley SA; Myers DS; Reed DL; Rokas A; Winka K
    Syst Biol; 2003 Aug; 52(4):477-87. PubMed ID: 12857639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survey of branch support methods demonstrates accuracy, power, and robustness of fast likelihood-based approximation schemes.
    Anisimova M; Gil M; Dufayard JF; Dessimoz C; Gascuel O
    Syst Biol; 2011 Oct; 60(5):685-99. PubMed ID: 21540409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fair-balance paradox, star-tree paradox, and Bayesian phylogenetics.
    Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Aug; 24(8):1639-55. PubMed ID: 17488737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Homoplasy and clade support.
    Brandley MC; Warren DL; Leaché AD; McGuire JA
    Syst Biol; 2009 Apr; 58(2):184-98. PubMed ID: 20525577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A confounding effect of missing data on character conflict in maximum likelihood and Bayesian MCMC phylogenetic analyses.
    Simmons MP
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Nov; 80():267-80. PubMed ID: 25173567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate, and powerful alternative.
    Anisimova M; Gascuel O
    Syst Biol; 2006 Aug; 55(4):539-52. PubMed ID: 16785212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phylogeny of Bembidion and related ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Trechinae: Bembidiini: Bembidiina).
    Maddison DR
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Jun; 63(3):533-76. PubMed ID: 22421212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using RAxML to Infer Phylogenies.
    Stamatakis A
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 51():6.14.1-6.14.14. PubMed ID: 26334924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: an example from Melanoplus grasshoppers.
    Carstens BC; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):400-11. PubMed ID: 17520504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining species tree topologies from clade probabilities under the coalescent.
    Allman ES; Degnan JH; Rhodes JA
    J Theor Biol; 2011 Nov; 289():96-106. PubMed ID: 21867714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Approximate maximum parsimony and ancestral maximum likelihood.
    Alon N; Chor B; Pardi F; Rapoport A
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2010; 7(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 20150680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Upper bounds on maximum likelihood for phylogenetic trees.
    Hendy MD; Holland BR
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Oct; 19 Suppl 2():ii66-72. PubMed ID: 14534174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interior-branch and bootstrap tests of phylogenetic trees.
    Sitnikova T; Rzhetsky A; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Mar; 12(2):319-33. PubMed ID: 7700156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the relationship between sequence similarity and accurate phylogenetic trees.
    Cantarel BL; Morrison HG; Pearson W
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Nov; 23(11):2090-100. PubMed ID: 16891377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
    McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.