BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17367520)

  • 1. Comparing a single-stage geocoding method to a multi-stage geocoding method: how much and where do they disagree?
    Lovasi GS; Weiss JC; Hoskins R; Whitsel EA; Rice K; Erickson CF; Psaty BM
    Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 17367520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Match rate and positional accuracy of two geocoding methods for epidemiologic research.
    Zhan FB; Brender JD; De Lima I; Suarez L; Langlois PH
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):842-9. PubMed ID: 17027286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Positional accuracy and geographic bias of four methods of geocoding in epidemiologic research.
    Schootman M; Sterling DA; Struthers J; Yan Y; Laboube T; Emo B; Higgs G
    Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17448683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Who Hits the Mark? A Comparative Study of the Free Geocoding Services of Google and OpenStreetMap].
    Lemke D; Mattauch V; Heidinger O; Hense HW
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Sep; 77(8-9):e160-5. PubMed ID: 26154258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Geocoding rural addresses in a community contaminated by PFOA: a comparison of methods.
    Vieira VM; Howard GJ; Gallagher LG; Fletcher T
    Environ Health; 2010 Apr; 9():18. PubMed ID: 20406495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying geocode location error using GIS methods.
    Strickland MJ; Siffel C; Gardner BR; Berzen AK; Correa A
    Environ Health; 2007 Apr; 6():10. PubMed ID: 17408484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the positional difference between two common geocoding methods.
    Duncan DT; Castro MC; Blossom JC; Bennett GG; Gortmaker SL
    Geospat Health; 2011 May; 5(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 21590677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
    Faure E; Danjou AM; Clavel-Chapelon F; Boutron-Ruault MC; Dossus L; Fervers B
    Environ Health; 2017 Feb; 16(1):15. PubMed ID: 28235407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positional error in automated geocoding of residential addresses.
    Cayo MR; Talbot TO
    Int J Health Geogr; 2003 Dec; 2(1):10. PubMed ID: 14687425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positional accuracy of geocoded addresses in epidemiologic research.
    Bonner MR; Han D; Nie J; Rogerson P; Vena JE; Freudenheim JL
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 12843763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misclassification errors from postal code-based geocoding to assign census geography in Nova Scotia, Canada.
    Terashima M; Kephart G
    Can J Public Health; 2016 Dec; 107(4-5):e424-e430. PubMed ID: 28026709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling the probability distribution of positional errors incurred by residential address geocoding.
    Zimmerman DL; Fang X; Mazumdar S; Rushton G
    Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 17214903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Positional accuracy of geocoding from residential postal codes versus full street addresses.
    Khan S; Pinault L; Tjepkema M; Wilkins R
    Health Rep; 2018 Feb; 29(2):3-9. PubMed ID: 29465738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positional accuracy of two methods of geocoding.
    Ward MH; Nuckols JR; Giglierano J; Bonner MR; Wolter C; Airola M; Mix W; Colt JS; Hartge P
    Epidemiology; 2005 Jul; 16(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 15951673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geocoding Error, Spatial Uncertainty, and Implications for Exposure Assessment and Environmental Epidemiology.
    Kinnee EJ; Tripathy S; Schinasi L; Shmool JLC; Sheffield PE; Holguin F; Clougherty JE
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32806682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geocoding addresses from a large population-based study: lessons learned.
    McElroy JA; Remington PL; Trentham-Dietz A; Robert SA; Newcomb PA
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 12843762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving geocoding outcomes for the Nebraska Cancer Registry: learning from proven practices.
    Lin G; Gray J; Qu M
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 21086822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multifaceted comparison of ArcGIS and MapMarker for automated geocoding.
    Kumar S; Liu M; Hwang SA
    Geospat Health; 2012 Nov; 7(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 23242688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A multi-stage approach to maximizing geocoding success in a large population-based cohort study through automated and interactive processes.
    Sonderman JS; Mumma MT; Cohen SS; Cope EL; Blot WJ; Signorello LB
    Geospat Health; 2012 May; 6(2):273-84. PubMed ID: 22639129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methods for retrospective geocoding in population studies: the Jackson Heart Study.
    Robinson JC; Wyatt SB; Hickson D; Gwinn D; Faruque F; Sims M; Sarpong D; Taylor HA
    J Urban Health; 2010 Jan; 87(1):136-50. PubMed ID: 20187277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.