513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17368247)
1. Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial.
Kluivers KB; Hendriks JC; Mol BW; Bongers MY; Bremer GL; de Vet HC; Vierhout ME; Brolmann HA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 17368247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.
Warren L; Ladapo JA; Borah BJ; Gunnarsson CL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 19835801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of life after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Nieboer TE; Hendriks JC; Bongers MY; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 119(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 22183215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pelvic organ function in randomized patients undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy.
Kluivers KB; Mol BW; Bremer GL; Brölmann HA; Vierhout ME; Bongers MY
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 17630161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is hysterectomy necessary for laparoscopic pelvic floor repair? A prospective study.
Rosen DM; Shukla A; Cario GM; Carlton MA; Chou D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 18971137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Cammarano C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2. PubMed ID: 15284779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies.
Hur HC; Guido RS; Mansuria SM; Hacker MR; Sanfilippo JS; Lee TT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 17478361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychological wellbeing after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy--a randomised controlled multicentre study.
Persson P; Wijma K; Hammar M; Kjølhede P
BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1023-30. PubMed ID: 16956334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcome and tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled study.
Härkki-Sirén P; Sjöberg J; Toivonen J; Tiitinen A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Oct; 79(10):866-71. PubMed ID: 11304971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of survival after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with the conventional abdominal approach for early-stage endometrial carcinoma: a review of the literature.
Gil-Moreno A; Díaz-Feijoo B; Morchón S; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 16431320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for total abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized trial.
Lakeman M; Kruitwagen RF; Vos MC; Roovers JP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 18619923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.
Fiorentino RP; Zepeda MA; Goldstein BH; John CR; Rettenmaier MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16431325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioperative complication rate in 1706 patients after a standardized laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy technique.
Bojahr B; Raatz D; Schonleber G; Abri C; Ohlinger R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 16698522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomised controlled trial of total compared with subtotal hysterectomy with one-year follow up results.
Gimbel H; Zobbe V; Andersen BM; Filtenborg T; Gluud C; Tabor A
BJOG; 2003 Dec; 110(12):1088-98. PubMed ID: 14664880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors associated with postoperative recovery after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy.
Persson P; Kjølhede P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Sep; 140(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 18456384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
Muzii L; Basile S; Zupi E; Marconi D; Zullo MA; Manci N; Bellati F; Angioli R; Benedetti Panici P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 17848323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Health technology assessment of surgical therapies for benign gynaecological disease.
Owusu-Ansah R; Gatongi D; Chien PF
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):841-79. PubMed ID: 17145485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
