BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17368373)

  • 1. Using a dense PTFE membrane without primary closure to achieve bone and tissue regeneration.
    Barber HD; Lignelli J; Smith BM; Bartee BK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 65(4):748-52. PubMed ID: 17368373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Osseointegration of titanium implants following guided bone regeneration using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and various bone fillers.
    Fiorellini JP; Kim DM; Nakajima Y; Weber HP
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Jun; 27(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 17694952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Guided tissue regeneration around dental implants in immediate extraction sockets: comparison of e-PTFE and a new titanium membrane.
    Celletti R; Davarpanah M; Etienne D; Pecora G; Tecucianu JF; Djukanovic D; Donath K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1994 Jun; 14(3):242-53. PubMed ID: 7995694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years.
    Jung RE; Fenner N; Hämmerle CH; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1065-73. PubMed ID: 22697628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regenerative barriers in immediate implant placement: a literature review.
    El Helow K; El Askary Ael S
    Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):360-71. PubMed ID: 18784536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utilization of d-PTFE Barriers for Post-Extraction Bone Regeneration in Preparation for Dental Implants.
    Greenstein G; Carpentieri JR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015; 36(7):465-73. PubMed ID: 26247440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expanded vs. dense polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Ronda M; Rebaudi A; Torelli L; Stacchi C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):859-66. PubMed ID: 23560678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment of peri-implant defects with guided bone regeneration: a comparative clinical study with various membranes and bone grafts.
    Lorenzoni M; Pertl C; Keil C; Wegscheider WA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 9796147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guided bone regeneration using bone grafts and collagen membranes.
    Wang HL; Carroll MJ
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):504-15. PubMed ID: 11495562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Healing of dehiscence-type defects in implants placed together with different barrier membranes: a comparative clinical study.
    Moses O; Pitaru S; Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Apr; 16(2):210-9. PubMed ID: 15777331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lethal photosensitization, autogenous bone, and e-PTFE membrane for the treatment of peri-implantitis: preliminary results.
    Haas R; Baron M; Dörtbudak O; Watzek G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 10874802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. 1. Surgical procedure in the maxilla.
    Buser D; Dula K; Belser U; Hirt HP; Berthold H
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993; 13(1):29-45. PubMed ID: 8330945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Histologic analysis of the osseointegration of endosseous implants in simulated extraction sockets with and without e-PTFE barriers. 1. Preliminary findings.
    Caudill RF; Meffert RM
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1991; 11(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 1802877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Qualitative and quantitative comparative study on different filling materials used in bone tissue regeneration: a controlled clinical study.
    Simion M; Dahlin C; Trisi P; Piattelli A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1994 Jun; 14(3):198-215. PubMed ID: 7995691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
    Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applications of guided tissue regeneration with dental implants.
    Arlin ML
    Oral Health; 1994 Jul; 84(7):27, 29, 31 passim; quiz 38. PubMed ID: 8779728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and histologic evaluation of allogeneic bone matrix versus autogenous bone chips associated with titanium-reinforced e-PTFE membrane for vertical ridge augmentation: a prospective pilot study.
    Fontana F; Santoro F; Maiorana C; Iezzi G; Piattelli A; Simion M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1003-12. PubMed ID: 19216268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A retrospective study of 237 sites treated consecutively with guided tissue regeneration.
    Shanaman RH
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1994 Aug; 14(4):292-301. PubMed ID: 7814222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Guided tissue regeneration around dental implants in immediate extraction sockets: comparison of resorbable and nonresorbable membranes].
    Mao C; Sato J; Matsuura M; Seto K
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1997 Dec; 19(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 10453535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conditions for success in guided bone regeneration: retrospective study on 376 implant sites.
    Mattout P; Mattout C
    J Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 71(12):1904-9. PubMed ID: 11156049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.