152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17369124)
1. ASC, TBS, and the power of ALTS.
Stoler MH
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):489-91. PubMed ID: 17369124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A 2-year prospective study of human papillomavirus persistence among women with a cytological diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Plummer M; Schiffman M; Castle PE; Maucort-Boulch D; Wheeler CM;
J Infect Dis; 2007 Jun; 195(11):1582-9. PubMed ID: 17471427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Bethesda 2001 on reporting of atypical squamous cells (ASC) with special emphasis on atypical squamous cells-cannot rule out high grade (ASC-H).
Simsir A; Ioffe O; Sun P; Elgert P; Cangiarella J; Levine PH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Jan; 34(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 16355376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new window into the natural history of human papillomavirus infection: a view from the ALTS (Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Triage Study) trial.
Franco EL; Trottier H
J Infect Dis; 2007 Jun; 195(11):1560-2. PubMed ID: 17471424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: diagnostic performance, human papillomavirus testing, and follow-up results.
Srodon M; Parry Dilworth H; Ronnett BM
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 108(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 16136595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A follow-up study of atypical squamous cells in gynecologic cytology using conventional papanicolaou smears and liquid-based preparations: the impact of the Bethesda System 2001.
Lee CY; Ng WK
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):548-55. PubMed ID: 17369129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Have we resolved how to triage equivocal cervical cytology?
Solomon D; Schiffman M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):250-1. PubMed ID: 14970266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Practice Bulletin No. 140: management of abnormal cervical cancer screening test results and cervical cancer precursors.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 122(6):1338-67. PubMed ID: 24264713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical screening in genitourinary medicine clinics--what are we trying to achieve?
Bradbeer C; Navaratne L
Sex Transm Infect; 1999 Oct; 75(5):286-7. PubMed ID: 10616349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Preventing cervical cancer globally by acting locally: if not now, when?
Gage JC; Castle PE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Oct; 102(20):1524-7. PubMed ID: 20884892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cytology of atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H): characteristics and histologic outcomes.
Sherman ME; Castle PE; Solomon D
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):298-305. PubMed ID: 16544318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk-based, postcolposcopic surveillance and management for HC2+ ASC and LSIL.
McCune KS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):e58; author reply e58-9. PubMed ID: 17466684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Reliability of the CINtec p16INK4a immunocytochemical test in screening cervical precancerous lesions].
Jović M; Nenadić D; Magić Z; Zoltarevski L; Durdević-Vukomanović B; Tatomirović Z; Strelić N; Vojvodić D
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2008 Mar; 65(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18494269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multinational comparison of diagnostic clues for uterine cervical lesions among cytotechnologists in Asian countries.
Taniyama K; Jhala DN; Katayama H; Kuraoka K; Naito Z; Rangdaeng S; Gong G; Lai CR; Chang A; Jhala NC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Jul; 39(7):489-94. PubMed ID: 20730895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cervical cancer precursors: cytohistologic correlation with the results of HPV testing].
Drozenová J; Drázd'áková M; Povýsil C; Dusková J
Cesk Patol; 2006 Jan; 42(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16506597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of human telomerase RNA gene in cervical cancer and precancerous lesions: comparison with cytological and human papillomavirus DNA test findings.
Li Y; Ye F; Lü WG; Zeng WJ; Wei LH; Xie X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 May; 20(4):631-7. PubMed ID: 20686384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Invader human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 and 18 assays as adjuncts to HPV screening of cervical papanicolaou smears with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Wong AK; Chan RC; Nichols WS; Bose S
Cancer; 2009 Feb; 115(4):823-32. PubMed ID: 19127558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immunocytochemical expression of p16INK4A and Ki-67 in cytologically negative and equivocal pap smears positive for oncogenic human papillomavirus.
Longatto Filho A; Utagawa ML; Shirata NK; Pereira SM; Namiyama GM; Kanamura CT; Santos Gda C; de Oliveira MA; Wakamatsu A; Nonogaki S; Roteli-Martins C; di Loreto C; Mattosinho de Castro Ferraz Mda G; Maeda MY; Alves VA; Syrjänen K
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2005 Apr; 24(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 15782067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid in detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pre- and post-menopausal Thai women with minor cervical cytological abnormalities.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(6):2327-31. PubMed ID: 25824759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immunohistochemical detection of p16INK4a in liquid-based cytology specimens on cell block sections.
Liu H; Shi J; Wilkerson M; Huang Y; Meschter S; Dupree W; Lin F
Cancer; 2007 Apr; 111(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 17330305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
