These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17369197)

  • 1. Genetic toxicity assessment: employing the best science for human safety evaluation part IV: a strategy in genotoxicity testing in drug development: some examples.
    Lorge E; Gervais V; Becourt-Lhote N; Maisonneuve C; Delongeas JL; Claude N
    Toxicol Sci; 2007 Jul; 98(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 17369197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.
    Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E;
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strategy for genotoxicity testing--metabolic considerations.
    Ku WW; Bigger A; Brambilla G; Glatt H; Gocke E; Guzzie PJ; Hakura A; Honma M; Martus HJ; Obach RS; Roberts S;
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 17141553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.
    Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM
    Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Follow-up testing of rodent carcinogens not positive in the standard genotoxicity testing battery: IWGT workgroup report.
    Kasper P; Uno Y; Mauthe R; Asano N; Douglas G; Matthews E; Moore M; Mueller L; Nakajima M; Singer T; Speit G;
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 17123861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic toxicity assessment: employing the best science for human safety evaluation Part VII: Why not start with a single test: a transformational alternative to genotoxicity hazard and risk assessment.
    Ku WW; Aubrecht J; Mauthe RJ; Schiestl RH; Fornace AJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2007 Sep; 99(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 17548889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic toxicity assessment: employing the best science for human safety evaluation part IV: Recommendation of a working group of the Gesellschaft fuer Umwelt-Mutationsforschung (GUM) for a simple and straightforward approach to genotoxicity testing.
    Pfuhler S; Albertini S; Fautz R; Herbold B; Madle S; Utesch D; Poth A;
    Toxicol Sci; 2007 Jun; 97(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 17303579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic toxicity assessment: employing the best science for human safety evaluation part VI: when salt and sugar and vegetables are positive, how can genotoxicity data serve to inform risk assessment?
    Pottenger LH; Bus JS; Gollapudi BB
    Toxicol Sci; 2007 Aug; 98(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 17387098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. International Conference on Harmonisation; guidance on S2(R1) Genotoxicity Testing and Data Interpretation for Pharmaceuticals intended for Human Use; availability. Notice.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2012 Jun; 77(110):33748-9. PubMed ID: 22675782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Follow-up actions from positive results of in vitro genetic toxicity testing.
    Dearfield KL; Thybaud V; Cimino MC; Custer L; Czich A; Harvey JS; Hester S; Kim JH; Kirkland D; Levy DD; Lorge E; Moore MM; Ouédraogo-Arras G; Schuler M; Suter W; Sweder K; Tarlo K; van Benthem J; van Goethem F; Witt KL
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2011 Apr; 52(3):177-204. PubMed ID: 20963811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro approaches to develop weight of evidence (WoE) and mode of action (MoA) discussions with positive in vitro genotoxicity results.
    Kirkland DJ; Aardema M; Banduhn N; Carmichael P; Fautz R; Meunier JR; Pfuhler S
    Mutagenesis; 2007 May; 22(3):161-75. PubMed ID: 17369606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic toxicity assessment: employing the best science for human safety evaluation part III: the comet assay as an alternative to in vitro clastogenicity tests for early drug candidate selection.
    Witte I; Plappert U; de Wall H; Hartmann A
    Toxicol Sci; 2007 May; 97(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17204584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical concepts in the planning and evaluation of drug safety from clinical trials in drug development: issues of international harmonization.
    O'Neill RT
    Stat Med; 1995 May 15-30; 14(9-10):117-27. PubMed ID: 7569506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative overview of current international strategies and guidelines for genetic toxicology testing for regulatory purposes.
    Cimino MC
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2006 Jun; 47(5):362-90. PubMed ID: 16649190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current and future application of genetic toxicity assays: the role and value of in vitro mammalian assays.
    Elespuru RK; Agarwal R; Atrakchi AH; Bigger CA; Heflich RH; Jagannath DR; Levy DD; Moore MM; Ouyang Y; Robison TW; Sotomayor RE; Cimino MC; Dearfield KL
    Toxicol Sci; 2009 Jun; 109(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 19336498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic toxicity assessment: employing the best science for human safety evaluation. Part I: Early screening for potential human mutagens.
    Jacobson-Kram D; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Sci; 2007 Mar; 96(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 17194803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mutagenicity testing for chemical risk assessment: update of the WHO/IPCS Harmonized Scheme.
    Eastmond DA; Hartwig A; Anderson D; Anwar WA; Cimino MC; Dobrev I; Douglas GR; Nohmi T; Phillips DH; Vickers C
    Mutagenesis; 2009 Jul; 24(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 19535363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.