These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17369317)

  • 21. The rise of the longitudinal arch when sitting, standing, and walking: Contributions of the windlass mechanism.
    Sichting F; Ebrecht F
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249965. PubMed ID: 33831112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validity of 3 clinical techniques for the measurement of static foot posture in older people.
    Menz HB; Munteanu SE
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2005 Aug; 35(8):479-86. PubMed ID: 16187508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differences in static and dynamic measures in evaluation of talonavicular mobility in gait.
    Dicharry JM; Franz JR; Della Croce U; Wilder RP; Riley PO; Kerrigan DC
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2009 Aug; 39(8):628-34. PubMed ID: 19648718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can positional MRI predict dynamic changes in the medial plantar arch? An exploratory pilot study.
    Johannsen F; Hansen P; Stallknecht S; Rathleff MS; Hangaard S; Nybing JD; Boesen M
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2016; 9(1):35. PubMed ID: 27588043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of using truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height ratio.
    McPoil TG; Cornwall MW; Vicenzino B; Teyhen DS; Molloy JM; Christie DS; Collins N
    Foot (Edinb); 2008 Dec; 18(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 20307441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Static and dynamic foot characteristics in children aged 1-13 years: a cross-sectional study.
    Müller S; Carlsohn A; Müller J; Baur H; Mayer F
    Gait Posture; 2012 Mar; 35(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 22118730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reliability of medial-longitudinal-arch measures for skin-markers based kinematic analysis.
    Caravaggi P; Matias AB; Taddei UT; Ortolani M; Leardini A; Sacco ICN
    J Biomech; 2019 May; 88():180-185. PubMed ID: 30910360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparative study of standing fleshed foot and walking and jumping bare footprint measurements.
    Howsam N; Bridgen A
    Sci Justice; 2018 Sep; 58(5):346-354. PubMed ID: 30193660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does foot placement affect the reliability of static foot posture measurements?
    McPoil TG; Carrell D; Ehlers D; Kuhlman H; Mufti J; Pomeroy M; Taylor O; Cornwall MW
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014; 104(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 24504575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The relationship between static lower extremity measurements and rearfoot motion during walking.
    McPoil TG; Cornwall MW
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1996 Nov; 24(5):309-14. PubMed ID: 8902683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Foot posture alteration and recovery following a full marathon run.
    Fukano M; Inami T; Nakagawa K; Narita T; Iso S
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2018 Nov; 18(10):1338-1345. PubMed ID: 30035682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Medial Longitudinal Arch Angle Presents Significant Differences Between Foot Types: A Biplane Fluoroscopy Study.
    Balsdon ME; Bushey KM; Dombroski CE; LeBel ME; Jenkyn TR
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Oct; 138(10):. PubMed ID: 27548905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tape that increases medial longitudinal arch height also reduces leg muscle activity: a preliminary study.
    Franettovich M; Chapman A; Vicenzino B
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 18317390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. THE USE OF A STATIC MEASURE TO PREDICT FOOT POSTURE AT MIDSUPPORT DURING RUNNING.
    Bade MB; Chi TL; Farrell KC; Gresl AJ; Hammel LJ; Koster BN; Leatzow AB; Thomas EC; McPoil TG
    Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2016 Feb; 11(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 26900501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does arch height affect impact loading at the lower back level in running?
    Ogon M; Aleksiev AR; Pope MH; Wimmer C; Saltzman CL
    Foot Ankle Int; 1999 Apr; 20(4):263-6. PubMed ID: 10229284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Shock absorption during forefoot running and its relationship to medial longitudinal arch height.
    Lees A; Lake M; Klenerman L
    Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Dec; 26(12):1081-8. PubMed ID: 16390643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of the menstrual cycle on static and dynamic kinematics of the foot medial longitudinal arch.
    Tagawa N; Okamura K; Araki D; Sugahara A; Kanai S
    J Orthop Sci; 2024 Mar; 29(2):609-614. PubMed ID: 36759230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Foot morphology influences the change in arch index between standing and walking conditions.
    Kramer PA; Lautzenheiser SG
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2022 Nov; 305(11):3254-3262. PubMed ID: 35132804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Increase in foot arch asymmetry after full marathon completion.
    Fukano M; Nakagawa K; Inami T; Higashihara A; Iizuka S; Narita T; Maemichi T; Yoshimura A; Yamaguchi S; Iso S
    J Sports Sci; 2021 Nov; 39(21):2468-2474. PubMed ID: 34120573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of plantar intrinsic muscle training on medial longitudinal arch morphology and dynamic function.
    Mulligan EP; Cook PG
    Man Ther; 2013 Oct; 18(5):425-30. PubMed ID: 23632367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.