These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17369326)
1. Statistical and clinical interpretation of research results. Allison GT J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2007; 97(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 17369326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start. Thomas L; Peterson ED JAMA; 2012 Aug; 308(8):773-4. PubMed ID: 22910753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving confidence in observational studies : should statistical analysis plans be made publicly available? Onukwugha E Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Mar; 31(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 23338964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Jannot AS; Agoritsas T; Gayet-Ageron A; Perneger TV J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 23347853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acknowledging and Overcoming Nonreproducibility in Basic and Preclinical Research. Ioannidis JP JAMA; 2017 Mar; 317(10):1019-1020. PubMed ID: 28192565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist. Mahid SS; Qadan M; Hornung CA; Galandiuk S Br J Surg; 2008 Aug; 95(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 18618864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias. Guan M; Vandekerckhove J Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 26126776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Publication bias as a function of study characteristics. Coburn KM; Vevea JL Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):310-30. PubMed ID: 26348731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Editorial: Sweet nothings - the value of negative findings for scientific progress. Oldehinkel AJT J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2018 Aug; 59(8):829-830. PubMed ID: 29992597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Lowering the P Value Threshold for Statistical Significance From .05 to .005 in Previously Published Randomized Clinical Trials in Major Medical Journals. Wayant C; Scott J; Vassar M JAMA; 2018 Nov; 320(17):1813-1815. PubMed ID: 30398593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [P value and confidence intervals: reporting and interpreting the result of a clinical study]. Ravani P; Andrulli S G Ital Nefrol; 2006; 23(5):490-501. PubMed ID: 17123262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Reverberations of the past or the pitfalls of statistical and data manipulation]. Martin-Du-Pan RC Rev Med Suisse; 2011 Jun; 7(299):1332-3. PubMed ID: 21793426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A Quantitative Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Herbal Medicine Research: The Road to Improvement. Naumann K J Altern Complement Med; 2018 Feb; 24(2):168-181. PubMed ID: 28915066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Publication bias in animal research presented at the 2008 Society of Critical Care Medicine Conference. Conradi U; Joffe AR BMC Res Notes; 2017 Jul; 10(1):262. PubMed ID: 28683761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Editorial: Sparse-data Bias-What the Savvy Reader Needs to Know. Leopold SS; Porcher R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Apr; 476(4):657-659. PubMed ID: 29481361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A clinician's perspective on a long time to publish. Peyrade F Lancet Haematol; 2017 Jan; 4(1):e11. PubMed ID: 27916631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]