These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17369326)

  • 21. Health care reform, statistical significance, effect size, and the future of the profession.
    Joseph RM
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2010; 49(4):319-20; discussion 319. PubMed ID: 20610199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Bias: nothing human is strange to us].
    Stegenga B
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2014 Jan; 121(1):3. PubMed ID: 24552066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Don't be misled by the orthopedic literature : tips for critical appraisal.
    Poolman RW; Kerkhoffs GM; Struijs PA; Bhandari M; International Evidence-Based Orthopedic Surgery Working Group
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Apr; 78(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 17464602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Meticulous manuscripts, messy results: Working together for robust science reporting.
    Barber LK
    Stress Health; 2017 Apr; 33(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 28387025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Frequent mistakes in the statistical inference of biomedical data.
    Martínez-Sellés M; Prieto L; Herranz I
    Ital Heart J; 2005 Feb; 6(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 15819501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Examination of CIs in health and medical journals from 1976 to 2019: an observational study.
    Barnett AG; Wren JD
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e032506. PubMed ID: 31753893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The dance about the "impact factor"].
    Rehfeld JF; Nielsen LB; Jørgensen HL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Jun; 169(24):2317. PubMed ID: 17594848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The reading, writing, and arithmetic of the medical literature, part 2: critical evaluation of statistical reporting.
    Mansfield L
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2005 Oct; 95(4):315-21; quiz 322, 380. PubMed ID: 16279560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Statistical analysis plans in observational research.
    Trinh QD; Sun M
    JAMA; 2013 Jan; 309(1):32. PubMed ID: 23280217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How often should we expect to be wrong? Statistical power, P values, and the expected prevalence of false discoveries.
    Marino MJ
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2018 May; 151():226-233. PubMed ID: 29248599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology.
    Vickers AJ; Sjoberg DD;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 25037638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Statistical analysis plans in observational research--reply.
    Thomas L; Peterson ED
    JAMA; 2013 Jan; 309(1):32. PubMed ID: 23280218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The use and misuse of statistical methodologies in pharmacology research.
    Marino MJ
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2014 Jan; 87(1):78-92. PubMed ID: 23747488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Designed Learning: Missing Data in Clinical Research.
    Stack CB; Butterworth T; Goldin R
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 May; 168(10):744. PubMed ID: 29632949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles.
    Lang T
    Croat Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15311405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The reading, writing, and arithmetic of the medical literature, part 3: critical appraisal of primary research.
    Mansfield L
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2006 Jan; 96(1):7-15; quiz 15-6, 44. PubMed ID: 16440526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Study design and statistical analysis.
    Elston DM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 Aug; 79(2):207. PubMed ID: 29128448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can't Get No Reproduction: Leading Researchers Discuss the Problem of Irreproducible Results.
    Williams R
    Circ Res; 2015 Sep; 117(8):667-70. PubMed ID: 26405184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. White hat bias: a threat to the integrity of scientific reporting.
    Cope MB; Allison DB
    Acta Paediatr; 2010 Nov; 99(11):1615-7. PubMed ID: 21039822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Misconceptions, Misuses, and Misinterpretations of P Values and Significance Testing.
    Gagnier JJ; Morgenstern H
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Sep; 99(18):1598-1603. PubMed ID: 28926390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.