These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17369326)
41. Significance testing - are we ready yet to abandon its use? The B Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Nov; 27(11):2087-90. PubMed ID: 21916530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Publication bias and the chase for statistical significance. MarĂn-Franch I J Optom; 2018; 11(2):67-68. PubMed ID: 29622154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005. Ioannidis JPA JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(14):1429-1430. PubMed ID: 29566133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Common scientific and statistical errors in obesity research. George BJ; Beasley TM; Brown AW; Dawson J; Dimova R; Divers J; Goldsby TU; Heo M; Kaiser KA; Keith SW; Kim MY; Li P; Mehta T; Oakes JM; Skinner A; Stuart E; Allison DB Obesity (Silver Spring); 2016 Apr; 24(4):781-90. PubMed ID: 27028280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Editorial: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference-The Least We Can Do. Leopold SS; Porcher R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):929-932. PubMed ID: 28124297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice. Kraemer HC; Kupfer DJ Biol Psychiatry; 2006 Jun; 59(11):990-6. PubMed ID: 16368078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. P-values in research reports. Ranstam J Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):289-90. PubMed ID: 16156452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. [Confidence interval calculation for small numbers of observations or no observations at all]. Harari G; Herbst S Harefuah; 2014 May; 153(5):289-91, 304, 303. PubMed ID: 25112122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus? Evans RG; Su DF Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. How to make your article more acceptable for the statistical reviewer. Herbison P Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 17279559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature. De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Analysis of data collected from right and left limbs: Accounting for dependence and improving statistical efficiency in musculoskeletal research. Stewart S; Pearson J; Rome K; Dalbeth N; Vandal AC Gait Posture; 2018 Jan; 59():182-187. PubMed ID: 29054045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Publication bias in situ. Phillips CV BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Aug; 4():20. PubMed ID: 15296515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Low power and type II errors in recent ophthalmology research. Khan Z; Milko J; Iqbal M; Masri M; Almeida DRP Can J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 51(5):368-372. PubMed ID: 27769328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. CBM research needs more power: Commentary on the special issue on cognitive bias modification. Rinck M J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Dec; 57():215. PubMed ID: 26987424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The bias busters. Yamey G BMJ; 2014 Jul; 349():g4748. PubMed ID: 25056305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Significance of Ray A; Atal S Postgrad Med J; 2020 Aug; 96(1138):500-502. PubMed ID: 32015191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]