These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17370346)

  • 1. Bayesian inverse analysis of neuromagnetic data using cortically constrained multiple dipoles.
    Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Vehtari A; Sams M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Oct; 28(10):979-94. PubMed ID: 17370346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic fMRI-guided MEG multidipole localization for visual responses.
    Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Vanni S; Vehtari A; Hämäläinen MS; Lampinen J; Jääskeläinen IP
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1087-99. PubMed ID: 18465749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatiotemporal Bayesian inference dipole analysis for MEG neuroimaging data.
    Jun SC; George JS; Paré-Blagoev J; Plis SM; Ranken DM; Schmidt DM; Wood CC
    Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 28(1):84-98. PubMed ID: 16023866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatially sparse source cluster modeling by compressive neuromagnetic tomography.
    Chang WT; Nummenmaa A; Hsieh JC; Lin FH
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 53(1):146-60. PubMed ID: 20488248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task-based comparison of inverse methods in magnetoencephalography.
    Küçükaltun-Yildirim E; Pantazis D; Leahy RM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1783-93. PubMed ID: 16941834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MRI prior computation and parallel tempering algorithm: a probabilistic resolution of the MEG/EEG inverse problem.
    Bertrand C; Hamada Y; Kado H
    Brain Topogr; 2001; 14(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 11599533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A hierarchical Bayesian method to resolve an inverse problem of MEG contaminated with eye movement artifacts.
    Fujiwara Y; Yamashita O; Kawawaki D; Doya K; Kawato M; Toyama K; Sato MA
    Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(2):393-409. PubMed ID: 19150653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving source detection and separation in a spatiotemporal Bayesian inference dipole analysis.
    Jun SC; George JS; Plis SM; Ranken DM; Schmidt DM; Wood CC
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2395-414. PubMed ID: 16675860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamical MEG source modeling with multi-target Bayesian filtering.
    Sorrentino A; Parkkonen L; Pascarella A; Campi C; Piana M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Jun; 30(6):1911-21. PubMed ID: 19378276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hierarchical Bayesian estimates of distributed MEG sources: theoretical aspects and comparison of variational and MCMC methods.
    Nummenmaa A; Auranen T; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Sams M; Vehtari A
    Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(2):669-85. PubMed ID: 17300961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian electromagnetic spatio-temporal imaging of extended sources with Markov Random Field and temporal basis expansion.
    Liu K; Yu ZL; Wu W; Gu Z; Li Y; Nagarajan S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 139():385-404. PubMed ID: 27355437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cancellation of EEG and MEG signals generated by extended and distributed sources.
    Ahlfors SP; Han J; Lin FH; Witzel T; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS; Halgren E
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Jan; 31(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 19639553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example.
    Lee AK; Larson E; Maddox RK
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Oct; (68):e4262. PubMed ID: 23128363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two dimensional inverse imaging (2DII) of current sources in magnetoencephalography.
    Moran JE; Tepley N
    Brain Topogr; 2000; 12(3):201-17. PubMed ID: 10791683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anatomically constrained dipole adjustment (ANACONDA) for accurate MEG/EEG focal source localizations.
    Im CH; Jung HK; Fujimaki N
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4931-53. PubMed ID: 16204881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian analysis of the neuromagnetic inverse problem with l(p)-norm priors.
    Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Vehtari A; Sams M
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):870-84. PubMed ID: 15955497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new wavelet transform to sparsely represent cortical current densities for EEG/MEG inverse problems.
    Liao K; Zhu M; Ding L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 23706527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.