These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17371079)

  • 1. Updating meta-analytic research findings: Bayesian approaches versus the medical model.
    Schmidt FL; Raju NS
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 17371079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis: testing a new meta-analytic procedure.
    Le H; Schmidt FL
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):416-38. PubMed ID: 17154755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choosing the best method for local validity estimation: relative accuracy of meta-analysis versus a local study versus Bayes-analysis.
    Newman DA; Jacobs RR; Bartram D
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Sep; 92(5):1394-413. PubMed ID: 17845093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
    Macaskill P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian approach to meta-analysis of plant pathology studies.
    Mila AL; Ngugi HK
    Phytopathology; 2011 Jan; 101(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 20822433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classic or Bayesian research design and analysis. Does it make a difference?
    Bloom BS; de Pouvourville N; Libert S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 11987435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results.
    Schmidt FL; Oh IS; Hayes TL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):97-128. PubMed ID: 18001516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
    Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the association between statin and fracture: a Bayesian consideration.
    Nguyen ND; Wang CY; Eisman JA; Nguyen TV
    Bone; 2007 Apr; 40(4):813-20. PubMed ID: 17178257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fall-prevention programs for the elderly: a Bayesian secondary meta-analysis.
    Lucke JE
    Can J Nurs Res; 2004 Sep; 36(3):48-64. PubMed ID: 15551662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
    Peters JL; Mengersen KL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analytic interval estimation for bivariate correlations.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 18778150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Large-sample Bayesian posterior distributions for probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
    Hazen GB; Huang M
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(5):512-34. PubMed ID: 16997928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha.
    Rodriguez MC; Maeda Y
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):306-22. PubMed ID: 16953707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian analysis of structural equation models with mixed exponential family and ordered categorical data.
    Lee SY; Tang NS
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):151-72. PubMed ID: 16709284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian model selection for mixtures of structural equation models with an unknown number of components.
    Lee SY; Song XY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):145-65. PubMed ID: 12803828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A semi-parametric Bayesian approach to average bioequivalence.
    Ghosh P; Rosner GL
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(6):1224-36. PubMed ID: 16832840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales.
    O'Rourke K; Altman DG
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(17):2733-42; author reply 2743. PubMed ID: 16118810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.
    Mahid SS; Qadan M; Hornung CA; Galandiuk S
    Br J Surg; 2008 Aug; 95(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 18618864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings.
    Hunter JE; Schmidt FL; Le H
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 May; 91(3):594-612. PubMed ID: 16737357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.