These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17371085)

  • 1. Retesting in selection: a meta-analysis of coaching and practice effects for tests of cognitive ability.
    Hausknecht JP; Halpert JA; Di Paolo NT; Moriarty Gerrard MO
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(2):373-85. PubMed ID: 17371085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An examination of psychometric bias due to retesting on cognitive ability tests in selection settings.
    Lievens F; Reeve CL; Heggestad ED
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1672-82. PubMed ID: 18020804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of corrections for faking on the validity of noncognitive measures in selection settings.
    Schmitt N; Oswald FL
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 May; 91(3):613-21. PubMed ID: 16737358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can I retake it? Exploring subgroup differences and criterion-related validity in promotion retesting.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Morgeson FP; Schleicher DJ; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):941-55. PubMed ID: 21517142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Educational attainment as a proxy for cognitive ability in selection: effects on levels of cognitive ability and adverse impact.
    Berry CM; Gruys ML; Sackett PR
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 May; 91(3):696-705. PubMed ID: 16737365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity.
    Nuechterlein KH; Green MF; Kern RS; Baade LE; Barch DM; Cohen JD; Essock S; Fenton WS; Frese FJ; Gold JM; Goldberg T; Heaton RK; Keefe RS; Kraemer H; Mesholam-Gately R; Seidman LJ; Stover E; Weinberger DR; Young AS; Zalcman S; Marder SR
    Am J Psychiatry; 2008 Feb; 165(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 18172019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychological measures as predictors of pilot performance: a meta-analysis.
    Martinussen M
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 11539171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overlooking the obvious: a meta-analytic comparison of digit symbol coding tasks and other cognitive measures in schizophrenia.
    Dickinson D; Ramsey ME; Gold JM
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2007 May; 64(5):532-42. PubMed ID: 17485605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occupational aluminum exposure: evidence in support of its neurobehavioral impact.
    Meyer-Baron M; Schäper M; Knapp G; van Thriel C
    Neurotoxicology; 2007 Nov; 28(6):1068-78. PubMed ID: 17692380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Change with age of information processing meta-operations in children].
    Yalçin K; Karakaş S
    Turk Psikiyatri Derg; 2008; 19(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 18791878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overall brain size, and not encephalization quotient, best predicts cognitive ability across non-human primates.
    Deaner RO; Isler K; Burkart J; van Schaik C
    Brain Behav Evol; 2007; 70(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 17510549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How smart do you think you are? A meta-analysis on the validity of self-estimates of cognitive ability.
    Freund PA; Kasten N
    Psychol Bull; 2012 Mar; 138(2):296-321. PubMed ID: 22181852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retesting after initial failure, coaching rumors, and warnings against faking in online personality measures for selection.
    Landers RN; Sackett PR; Tuzinski KA
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):202-10. PubMed ID: 20718510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive ability predicts objectively measured counterproductive work behaviors.
    Dilchert S; Ones DS; Davis RD; Rostow CD
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):616-27. PubMed ID: 17484545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparability, reliability, and practice effects on alternate forms of the Digit Symbol Substitution and Symbol Digit Modalities tests.
    Hinton-Bayre A; Geffen G
    Psychol Assess; 2005 Jun; 17(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 16029111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].
    Bralet MC; Navarre M; Eskenazi AM; Lucas-Ross M; Falissard B
    Encephale; 2008 Dec; 34(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 19081451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial validity and reliability of the SCCAN: using tailored testing to assess adult cognition and communication.
    Milman LH; Holland A; Kaszniak AW; D'Agostino J; Garrett M; Rapcsak S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Feb; 51(1):49-69. PubMed ID: 18230855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex differences in general knowledge domains.
    Lynn R; Ivanec D; Zarevski P
    Coll Antropol; 2009 Jun; 33(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 19662772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application patterns when applicants know the odds: implications for selection research and practice.
    Kuncel NR; Klieger DM
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(2):586-93. PubMed ID: 17371103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do warnings of response verification moderate the relationship between personality and cognitive ability?
    Vasilopoulos NL; Cucina JM; McElreath JM
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):306-22. PubMed ID: 15769240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.