These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17371086)

  • 1. Personality assessment across selection and development contexts: insights into response distortion.
    Ellingson JE; Sackett PR; Connelly BS
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(2):386-95. PubMed ID: 17371086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Raymark PH; Roth PL
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):536-52. PubMed ID: 15910148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Positive response distortion by police officer applicants: association of Paulhus Deception Scales With MMPI-2 and Inwald Personality Inventory Validity Scales.
    Detrick P; Chibnall JT
    Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 18258735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance.
    Heggestad ED; Morrison M; Reeve CL; McCloy RA
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 16435935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection.
    Hogan J; Barrett P; Hogan R
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Sep; 92(5):1270-85. PubMed ID: 17845085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hospitals probe job candidates' values for organizational 'fit'.
    Eubanks P
    Hospitals; 1991 Oct; 65(20):36, 38. PubMed ID: 1916712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Police applicant response bias on the California Psychological Inventory.
    Detrick P; Roberts RM
    Psychol Serv; 2022 Feb; 19(1):176-182. PubMed ID: 33539136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of item order on intentional response distortion in the assessment of high potentials: assessing pilot applicants.
    Khorramdel L; Kubinger KD; Uitz A
    Int J Psychol; 2014 Apr; 49(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 24811884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An integrative typology of personality assessment for aggression: implications for predicting counterproductive workplace behavior.
    Bing MN; Stewart SM; Davison HK; Green PD; McIntyre MD; James LR
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):722-44. PubMed ID: 17484553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retesting personality in employee selection: implications of the context, sample, and setting.
    Holladay CL; David E; Johnson SK
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Apr; 112(2):486-501. PubMed ID: 23833877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personality and defense mechanisms in late adulthood.
    Yu Y; Chamorro-Premuzic T; Honjo S
    J Aging Health; 2008 Aug; 20(5):526-44. PubMed ID: 18456867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antarctic culture: 50 years of Antarctic expeditions.
    Sarris A
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 Sep; 78(9):886-92. PubMed ID: 17891899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexism and beautyism effects in selection as a function of self-monitoring level of decision maker.
    Jawahar IM; Mattsson J
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):563-73. PubMed ID: 15910150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?
    Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Drasgow F; Williams BA
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 16435936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Basic trends and principles of the psychological expertise of cosmonauts].
    Ioseliani KK; Narinskaia AL; Khisambeev ShR
    Kosm Biol Aviakosm Med; 1982; 16(4):4-8. PubMed ID: 6750236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Less Evaluative Measures of Personality in Job Applicant Contexts: The Effect on Socially Desirable Responding and Criterion Validity.
    Wood JK; Anglim J; Horwood S
    J Pers Assess; 2024; 106(3):372-383. PubMed ID: 37703381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Personality determinants of effectiveness in performing duties by soldiers in active service in the landing-shock brigade].
    Florkowski A; Caban Z; Szczesny D; Zboralski K
    Psychiatr Pol; 1996; 30(2):331-9. PubMed ID: 8650293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of the Operating Room Coordinator's risk appreciation on operating room efficiency.
    Stepaniak PS; Mannaerts GH; de Quelerij M; de Vries G
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 19299796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of borderline personality features in population samples: is the Personality Assessment Inventory-Borderline Features scale measurement invariant across sex and age?
    De Moor MH; Distel MA; Trull TJ; Boomsma DI
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Mar; 21(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 19290772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study Protocol on Intentional Distortion in Personality Assessment: Relationship with Test Format, Culture, and Cognitive Ability.
    Van Geert E; Orhon A; Cioca IA; Mamede R; Golušin S; Hubená B; Morillo D
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():933. PubMed ID: 27445902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.