These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17371093)

  • 1. Evaluating dynamic performance: the influence of salient Gestalt characteristics on performance ratings.
    Reb J; Cropanzano R
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(2):490-9. PubMed ID: 17371093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding performance ratings: dynamic performance, attributions, and rating purpose.
    Reb J; Greguras GJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Jan; 95(1):213-20. PubMed ID: 20085418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More than just the mean: moving to a dynamic view of performance-based compensation.
    Barnes CM; Reb J; Ang D
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):711-8. PubMed ID: 22250669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The moderating role of employee positive well being on the relation between job satisfaction and job performance.
    Wright TA; Cropanzano R; Bonett DG
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2007 Apr; 12(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 17469992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Professional expertise of higher level employees; age stereotyping in self-assessments and supervisor ratings].
    van der Heijden BI
    Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 2000 Apr; 31(2):62-9. PubMed ID: 10816893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-other agreement in job performance ratings: a meta-analytic test of a process model.
    Heidemeier H; Moser K
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):353-70. PubMed ID: 19271795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance: a curvilinear assessment.
    Zhang X; Bartol KM
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Sep; 95(5):862-73. PubMed ID: 20718512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working hard and working smart: motivation and ability during typical and maximum performance.
    Klehe UC; Anderson N
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Jul; 92(4):978-92. PubMed ID: 17638459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recovery, well-being, and performance-related outcomes: the role of workload and vacation experiences.
    Fritz C; Sonnentag S
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jul; 91(4):936-45. PubMed ID: 16834516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Employee self-enhancement motives and job performance behaviors: investigating the moderating effects of employee role ambiguity and managerial perceptions of employee commitment.
    Yun S; Takeuchi R; Liu W
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):745-56. PubMed ID: 17484554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: a Monte Carlo investigation.
    Komar S; Brown DJ; Komar JA; Robie C
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jan; 93(1):140-54. PubMed ID: 18211141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does a structured free recall intervention reduce the effect of stereotypes on performance ratings and by what cognitive mechanism?
    Baltes BB; Bauer CB; Frensch PA
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Jan; 92(1):151-64. PubMed ID: 17227157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Job demands and job performance: the mediating effect of psychological and physical strain and the moderating effect of role clarity.
    Lang J; Thomas JL; Bliese PD; Adler AB
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2007 Apr; 12(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 17469994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Between-individual comparisons in performance evaluation: a perspective from prospect theory.
    Wong KF; Kwong JY
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):284-94. PubMed ID: 15769238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study on the effects of some reinforcers to improve performance of employees in a retail industry.
    Raj JD; Nelson JA; Rao KS
    Behav Modif; 2006 Nov; 30(6):848-66. PubMed ID: 17050767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior.
    Neubert MJ; Kacmar KM; Carlson DS; Chonko LB; Roberts JA
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Nov; 93(6):1220-33. PubMed ID: 19025244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessor cognitive processes in an operational assessment center.
    Lance CE; Foster MR; Gentry WA; Thoresen JD
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):22-35. PubMed ID: 14769118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality.
    Liao H; Toya K; Lepak DP; Hong Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):371-91. PubMed ID: 19271796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The moderating role of subordinate political skill on supervisors' impressions of subordinate ingratiation and ratings of subordinate interpersonal facilitation.
    Treadway DC; Ferris GR; Duke AB; Adams GL; Thatcher JB
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):848-55. PubMed ID: 17484564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do prospective workday appraisals influence end-of-workday affect and self-monitored performance?
    Grawitch MJ; Granda SE; Barber LK
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2008 Oct; 13(4):331-44. PubMed ID: 18837628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.