These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Stimulus intensity affects the latency but not the amplitude of the N2pc. Brisson B; Robitaille N; Jolicoeur P Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(15):1627-30. PubMed ID: 17885614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. ERP analyses of task effects on semantic processing from words. Marí-Beffa P; Valdés B; Cullen DJ; Catena A; Houghton G Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):293-305. PubMed ID: 15820637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An ERP index of task relevance evaluation of visual stimuli. Potts GF Brain Cogn; 2004 Oct; 56(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 15380870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Location- or feature-based targeting of peripheral attention. Vandenberghe R; Gitelman DR; Parrish TB; Mesulam MM Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 1):37-47. PubMed ID: 11525335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Self-awareness and the subconscious effect of personal pronouns on word encoding: a magnetoencephalography (MEG) study. Walla P; Greiner K; Duregger C; Deecke L; Thurner S Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):796-809. PubMed ID: 17005211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of cue-target interval on the N2pc. Robitaille N; Jolicoeur P Neuroreport; 2006 Oct; 17(15):1655-8. PubMed ID: 17001287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reading normal and degraded words: contribution of the dorsal and ventral visual pathways. Cohen L; Dehaene S; Vinckier F; Jobert A; Montavont A Neuroimage; 2008 Mar; 40(1):353-66. PubMed ID: 18182174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Neural mechanisms of detecting and orienting attention toward unattended threatening somatosensory targets. I. Intermodal effects. Dowman R Psychophysiology; 2007 May; 44(3):407-19. PubMed ID: 17371498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Covert processing of visual form in the absence of area LO. Kentridge RW; Heywood CA; Milner AD Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1488-95. PubMed ID: 15246286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An event-related potential examination of attended and unattended stimuli in visual selection using bilateral stimulus presentation. Drysdale KA; Finlay DC; Fulham WR Biol Psychol; 1995 Feb; 39(2-3):115-29. PubMed ID: 7734626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading. Plummer P; Rayner K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Short-term consolidation of visual patterns interferes with visuo-spatial attention: converging evidence from human electrophysiology. Robitaille N; Jolicoeur P; Dell'Acqua R; Sessa P Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1185():158-69. PubMed ID: 17936730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Perceptual and lexical effects in letter identification: an event-related potential study of the word superiority effect. Martin CD; Nazir T; Thierry G; Paulignan Y; Démonet JF Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 1098(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 16774747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3. Verleger R; Paehge T; Kolev V; Yordanova J; Jaśkowski P Biol Psychol; 2006 Oct; 73(3):298-313. PubMed ID: 16837117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Flexibility in spatial and non-spatial feature grouping: an event-related potentials study. Nikolaev AR; van Leeuwen C Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 22(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 15561496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. When does the brain register deviances from standard word spellings?--An ERP study. Sauseng P; Bergmann J; Wimmer H Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 20(3):529-32. PubMed ID: 15268930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]