291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17372711)
21. Rapid maxillary expansion with palatal anchorage of the hyrax expansion screw--pilot study with case presentation.
Harzer W; Schneider M; Gedrange T
J Orofac Orthop; 2004 Sep; 65(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 15378196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes between tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne hybrid nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansions in adults: a retrospective observational study.
An JS; Seo BY; Ahn SJ
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):658. PubMed ID: 34922526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of miniscrew-supported rapid maxillary expansion in adolescents: A prospective randomized clinical trial.
Celenk-Koca T; Erdinc AE; Hazar S; Harris L; English JD; Akyalcin S
Angle Orthod; 2018 Nov; 88(6):702-709. PubMed ID: 30102085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minimally invasive rapid palatal expansion with an implant-supported hyrax screw.
Harzer W; Reusser L; Hansen L; Richter R; Nagel T; Tausche E
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Feb; 55(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 20128744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
Kircelli BH; Pektaş ZO; Kircelli C
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):650-9. PubMed ID: 16808573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Rotterdam Palatal Distractor: introduction of the new bone-borne device and report of the pilot study.
Koudstaal MJ; van der Wal KG; Wolvius EB; Schulten AJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 16154318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transverse changes determined by rapid and slow maxillary expansion--a low-dose CT-based randomized controlled trial.
Martina R; Cioffi I; Farella M; Leone P; Manzo P; Matarese G; Portelli M; Nucera R; Cordasco G
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2012 Aug; 15(3):159-68. PubMed ID: 22812438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Alveolar bone changes after rapid maxillary expansion with tooth-born appliances: a systematic review.
Lo Giudice A; Barbato E; Cosentino L; Ferraro CM; Leonardi R
Eur J Orthod; 2018 May; 40(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 29016774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of bipartite versus tripartite osteotomy for maxillary transversal expansion using 3-dimensional preoperative and postexpansion computed tomography data.
Landes CA; Laudemann K; Petruchin O; Mack MG; Kopp S; Ludwig B; Sader RA; Seitz O
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2287-301. PubMed ID: 19761925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Long term skeletal and dental changes between tooth-anchored versus Dresden bone-anchored rapid maxillary expansion using CBCT images in adolescents: Randomized clinical trial.
Davami K; Talma E; Harzer W; Lagravère MO
Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):317-329. PubMed ID: 32245745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of a hinged expansion screw for median mandibular distraction treatment on the lower first molars regarding tooth inclination and intermolar transverse distance.
Muchitsch AP; Winsauer H; Wendl B; Pichelmayer M; Kuljuh E; Navysany MT; Muchitsch M
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jan; 75(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 24442554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The efficacy of maxillary protraction protocols with the micro-implant-assisted rapid palatal expander (MARPE) and the novel N2 mini-implant-a finite element study.
Moon W; Wu KW; MacGinnis M; Sung J; Chu H; Youssef G; Machado A
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():16. PubMed ID: 26061987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion and orthodontic treatment. Effects on dental, skeletal and nasal structures and rhinological findings.
Magnusson A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2013; (229):1-104. PubMed ID: 23964483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Skeletal and dental changes after rapid maxillary expansion: a computed tomography study.
Ghoneima A; Abdel-Fattah E; Eraso F; Fardo D; Kula K; Hartsfield J
Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 21175023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Are there benefits from using bone-borne maxillary expansion instead of tooth-borne maxillary expansion? A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Krüsi M; Eliades T; Papageorgiou SN
Prog Orthod; 2019 Feb; 20(1):9. PubMed ID: 30799516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Periodontal, dentoalveolar, and skeletal effects of tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne expansion appliances.
Gunyuz Toklu M; Germec-Cakan D; Tozlu M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jul; 148(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 26124033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Multitomographic evaluation of the dental effects of two different rapid palatal expansion appliances.
Olmez H; Akin E; Karaçay S
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 17702798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differential treatment effects of two anchorage systems for rapid maxillary expansion: a retrospective cephalometric study.
Hourfar J; Kinzinger GS; Ludwig B; Spindler J; Lisson JA
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Sep; 77(5):314-24. PubMed ID: 27272056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Expansion patterns in surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion : Transpalatal distractor versus hyrax appliance.
Kunz F; Linz C; Baunach G; Böhm H; Meyer-Marcotty P
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Sep; 77(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 27431858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cephalometric and dental arch changes to Haas-type rapid maxillary expander anchored to deciduous vs permanent molars: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
Cerruto C; Ugolini A; Di Vece L; Doldo T; Caprioglio A; Silvestrini-Biavati A
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):385-393. PubMed ID: 28397083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
