These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17372783)

  • 21. Resource holding potential, subjective resource value, and game theoretical models of aggressiveness signalling.
    Hurd PL
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Aug; 241(3):639-48. PubMed ID: 16469335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reproductive skew, fighting costs and winner-loser effects in social dominance evolution.
    Leimar O; Bshary R
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 May; 91(5):1036-1046. PubMed ID: 35304750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The winner and loser effect, serotonin transporter genotype, and the display of offensive aggression.
    Kloke V; Jansen F; Heiming RS; Palme R; Lesch KP; Sachser N
    Physiol Behav; 2011 Jul; 103(5):565-74. PubMed ID: 21549735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Variation between self- and mutual assessment in animal contests.
    Mesterton-Gibbons M; Heap SM
    Am Nat; 2014 Feb; 183(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 24464195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can mixed strategies be stable in asymmetric games?
    Binmore K; Samuelson L
    J Theor Biol; 2001 May; 210(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11388325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The coevolution of transitive inference and memory capacity in the hawk-dove game.
    Doi K; Nakamaru M
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Nov; 456():91-107. PubMed ID: 30077734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Beyond replicator dynamics: From frequency to density dependent models of evolutionary games.
    Křivan V; Galanthay TE; Cressman R
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Oct; 455():232-248. PubMed ID: 29990466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is food worth fighting for? ESS's in mixed populations of Kleptoparasites and Foragers.
    Luther RM; Broom M; Ruxton GD
    Bull Math Biol; 2007 May; 69(4):1121-46. PubMed ID: 17357003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Testing game theory models: fighting ability and decision rules in chameleon contests.
    Stuart-Fox D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Jun; 273(1593):1555-61. PubMed ID: 16777752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. When should signals of submission be given?-A game theory model.
    Matsumura S; Hayden TJ
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Jun; 240(3):425-33. PubMed ID: 16293264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Status signaling games in animal contests.
    Kim YG
    J Theor Biol; 1995 Sep; 176(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 7475112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Why are small males aggressive?
    Morrell LJ; Lindström J; Ruxton GD
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Jun; 272(1569):1235-41. PubMed ID: 16024387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Artificial distinction and real discrimination.
    Inarra E; Laruelle A
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Jul; 305():110-7. PubMed ID: 22498802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Socially stable territories: the negotiation of space by interacting foragers.
    Pereira HM; Bergman A; Roughgarden J
    Am Nat; 2003 Jan; 161(1):143-52. PubMed ID: 12650468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Wasps Use Social Eavesdropping to Learn about Individual Rivals.
    Tibbetts EA; Wong E; Bonello S
    Curr Biol; 2020 Aug; 30(15):3007-3010.e2. PubMed ID: 32589910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Male-male combats in a polymorphic lizard: residency and size, but not color, affect fighting rules and contest outcome.
    Sacchi R; Pupin F; Gentilli A; Rubolini D; Scali S; Fasola M; Galeotti P
    Aggress Behav; 2009; 35(3):274-83. PubMed ID: 19291744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fighting zebrafish: characterization of aggressive behavior and winner-loser effects.
    Oliveira RF; Silva JF; Simões JM
    Zebrafish; 2011 Jun; 8(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 21612540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 'Winner effect' without winning: unresolved social conflicts increase the probability of winning a subsequent contest in a cichlid fish.
    Dijkstra PD; Schaafsma SM; Hofmann HA; Groothuis TG
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Jan; 105(2):489-92. PubMed ID: 21939680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The hawk-dove game in a sexually reproducing species explains a colourful polymorphism of an endangered bird.
    Kokko H; Griffith SC; Pryke SR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Oct; 281(1793):. PubMed ID: 25209943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Winning fights elevates testosterone levels in California mice and enhances future ability to win fights.
    Oyegbile TO; Marler CA
    Horm Behav; 2005 Sep; 48(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 15979073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.