302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17372977)
1. Similar development of cued and learned home bases in control and hippocampal-damaged rats in an open field exploratory task.
Lehmann H; Clark BJ; Whishaw IQ
Hippocampus; 2007; 17(5):370-80. PubMed ID: 17372977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hippocampal damage produces retrograde but not anterograde amnesia for a cued location in a spontaneous exploratory task in rats.
Travis SG; Sparks FT; Arnold T; Lehmann H; Sutherland RJ; Whishaw IQ
Hippocampus; 2010 Sep; 20(9):1095-104. PubMed ID: 19957337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rats with hippocampal lesion show impaired learning and memory in the ziggurat task: a new task to evaluate spatial behavior.
Faraji J; Lehmann H; Metz GA; Sutherland RJ
Behav Brain Res; 2008 May; 189(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 18192033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Home bases formed to visual cues but not to self-movement (dead reckoning) cues in exploring hippocampectomized rats.
Hines DJ; Whishaw IQ
Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 22(9):2363-75. PubMed ID: 16262675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Movements of exploration intact in rats with hippocampal lesions.
Clark BJ; Hines DJ; Hamilton DA; Whishaw IQ
Behav Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 163(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 15904983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preserved learning about allocentric cues but impaired flexible memory expression in rats with hippocampal lesions.
Ramos JM
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2010 May; 93(4):506-14. PubMed ID: 20109565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patterns of retrograde amnesia for recent and remote incidental spatial learning in rats.
Gaskin S; Tardif M; Mumby DG
Hippocampus; 2009 Dec; 19(12):1212-21. PubMed ID: 19294648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The point of entry contributes to the organization of exploratory behavior of rats on an open field: an example of spontaneous episodic memory.
Nemati F; Whishaw IQ
Behav Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 182(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 17590451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning associations between places and visual cues without learning to navigate: neither fornix nor entorhinal cortex is required.
Gaffan EA; Bannerman DM; Healey AN
Hippocampus; 2003; 13(4):445-60. PubMed ID: 12836914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidental (unreinforced) and reinforced spatial learning in rats with ventral and dorsal lesions of the hippocampus.
Gaskin S; Gamliel A; Tardif M; Cole E; Mumby DG
Behav Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 202(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 19447282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preserved spatial memory after hippocampal lesions: effects of extensive experience in a complex environment.
Winocur G; Moscovitch M; Fogel S; Rosenbaum RS; Sekeres M
Nat Neurosci; 2005 Mar; 8(3):273-5. PubMed ID: 15723062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term deficits on a foraging task after bilateral vestibular deafferentation in rats.
Zheng Y; Goddard M; Darlington CL; Smith PF
Hippocampus; 2009 May; 19(5):480-6. PubMed ID: 19072773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differential contributions of hippocampus, amygdala and perirhinal cortex to recognition of novel objects, contextual stimuli and stimulus relationships.
Moses SN; Cole C; Driscoll I; Ryan JD
Brain Res Bull; 2005 Sep; 67(1-2):62-76. PubMed ID: 16140164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of the CA3 subregion of the dorsal hippocampus in spatial pattern completion in the rat.
Gold AE; Kesner RP
Hippocampus; 2005; 15(6):808-14. PubMed ID: 16010664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hippocampal damage and anterograde object-recognition in rats after long retention intervals.
Mumby DG; Tremblay A; Lecluse V; Lehmann H
Hippocampus; 2005; 15(8):1050-6. PubMed ID: 16145694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Longitudinal axis of the hippocampus: both septal and temporal poles of the hippocampus support water maze spatial learning depending on the training protocol.
de Hoz L; Knox J; Morris RG
Hippocampus; 2003; 13(5):587-603. PubMed ID: 12921349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Context-dependent effects of hippocampal damage on memory in the shock-probe test.
Lehmann H; Carfagnini A; Yamin S; Mumby DG
Hippocampus; 2005; 15(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 15390168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cued platform training reveals early development of directional responding among preweanling rats in the Morris water task.
Akers KG; Candelaria-Cook FT; Rice JP; Johnson TE; Hamilton DA
Dev Psychobiol; 2011 Jan; 53(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20687138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Involuntary, unreinforced (pure) spatial learning is impaired by fimbria-fornix but not by dorsal hippocampus lesions.
White NM; Holahan MR; Goffaux P
Hippocampus; 2003; 13(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 12722973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential induction of c-Jun and Fos-like proteins in rat hippocampus and dorsal striatum after training in two water maze tasks.
Teather LA; Packard MG; Smith DE; Ellis-Behnke RG; Bazan NG
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2005 Sep; 84(2):75-84. PubMed ID: 15936959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
