These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17373710)

  • 1. ZRANK: reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function.
    Pierce B; Weng Z
    Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):1078-86. PubMed ID: 17373710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A combination of rescoring and refinement significantly improves protein docking performance.
    Pierce B; Weng Z
    Proteins; 2008 Jul; 72(1):270-9. PubMed ID: 18214977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The performance of ZDOCK and ZRANK in rounds 6-11 of CAPRI.
    Wiehe K; Pierce B; Tong WW; Hwang H; Mintseris J; Weng Z
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):719-25. PubMed ID: 17803212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. RDOCK: refinement of rigid-body protein docking predictions.
    Li L; Chen R; Weng Z
    Proteins; 2003 Nov; 53(3):693-707. PubMed ID: 14579360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm.
    Chen R; Li L; Weng Z
    Proteins; 2003 Jul; 52(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 12784371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complex-type-dependent scoring functions in protein-protein docking.
    Li CH; Ma XH; Shen LZ; Chang S; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Biophys Chem; 2007 Aug; 129(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17540496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How different from random are docking predictions when ranked by scoring functions?
    Feliu E; Oliva B
    Proteins; 2010 Dec; 78(16):3376-85. PubMed ID: 20848549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. pyDock: electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid-body protein-protein docking.
    Cheng TM; Blundell TL; Fernandez-Recio J
    Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(2):503-15. PubMed ID: 17444519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CyClus: a fast, comprehensive cylindrical interface approximation clustering/reranking method for rigid-body protein-protein docking decoys.
    Omori S; Kitao A
    Proteins; 2013 Jun; 81(6):1005-16. PubMed ID: 23344972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking.
    Chen R; Weng Z
    Proteins; 2003 May; 51(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 12696051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
    Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient restraints for protein-protein docking by comparison of observed amino acid substitution patterns with those predicted from local environment.
    Chelliah V; Blundell TL; Fernández-Recio J
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Apr; 357(5):1669-82. PubMed ID: 16488431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction and scoring of docking poses with pyDock.
    Grosdidier S; Pons C; Solernou A; Fernández-Recio J
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):852-8. PubMed ID: 17876821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SDOCK: a global protein-protein docking program using stepwise force-field potentials.
    Zhang C; Lai L
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Sep; 32(12):2598-612. PubMed ID: 21618559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scoring a diverse set of high-quality docked conformations: a metascore based on electrostatic and desolvation interactions.
    Camacho CJ; Ma H; Champ PC
    Proteins; 2006 Jun; 63(4):868-77. PubMed ID: 16506242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bootstrap-based consensus scoring method for protein-ligand docking.
    Fukunishi H; Teramoto R; Takada T; Shimada J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 18426197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A soft docking algorithm for predicting the structures of protein-protein complexes.
    Li CH; Ma XH; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Sheng Wu Hua Xue Yu Sheng Wu Wu Li Xue Bao (Shanghai); 2003 Jan; 35(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 12518225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrating atom-based and residue-based scoring functions for protein-protein docking.
    Vreven T; Hwang H; Weng Z
    Protein Sci; 2011 Sep; 20(9):1576-86. PubMed ID: 21739500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effective scoring function for protein sequence design.
    Liang S; Grishin NV
    Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(2):271-81. PubMed ID: 14696189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.