These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17374064)

  • 1. Tape-stripping method in man: comparison of evaporimetric methods.
    Zhai H; Dika E; Goldovsky M; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2007 May; 13(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 17374064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaporimetry in man.
    Shah JH; Zhai H; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 Aug; 11(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 15998333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of closed chamber and open chamber evaporimetry.
    Cohen JC; Hartman DG; Garofalo MJ; Basehoar A; Raynor B; Ashbrenner E; Akin FJ
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 19152579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring transepidermal water loss: a comparative in vivo study of condenser-chamber, unventilated-chamber and open-chamber systems.
    Farahmand S; Tien L; Hui X; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Nov; 15(4):392-8. PubMed ID: 19832948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the VapoMeter, a closed unventilated chamber system to assess transepidermal water loss vs. the open chamber Tewameter.
    De Paepe K; Houben E; Adam R; Wiesemann F; Rogiers V
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 Feb; 11(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 15691261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A closed unventilated chamber for the measurement of transepidermal water loss.
    Nuutinen J; Alanen E; Autio P; Lahtinen MR; Harvima I; Lahtinen T
    Skin Res Technol; 2003 May; 9(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 12709124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A portable device using a closed chamber system for measuring transepidermal water loss: comparison with the conventional method.
    Tagami H; Kobayashi H; Kikuchi K
    Skin Res Technol; 2002 Feb; 8(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 12005122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a hand-held evaporimeter (VapoMeter) for the measurement of transepidermal water loss in healthy dogs.
    Lau-Gillard PJ; Hill PB; Chesney CJ; Budleigh C; Immonen A
    Vet Dermatol; 2010 Apr; 21(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 19961567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Closed-chamber transepidermal water loss measurement: microclimate, calibration and performance.
    Imhof RE; De Jesus ME; Xiao P; Ciortea LI; Berg EP
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2009 Apr; 31(2):97-118. PubMed ID: 19175433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased stratum corneum serine protease activity in acute eczematous atopic skin.
    Voegeli R; Rawlings AV; Breternitz M; Doppler S; Schreier T; Fluhr JW
    Br J Dermatol; 2009 Jul; 161(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 19416247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stratum corneum adhesive tape stripping: influence of anatomical site, application pressure, duration and removal.
    Löffler H; Dreher F; Maibach HI
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Oct; 151(4):746-52. PubMed ID: 15491413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Side-by-side comparison of an open-chamber (TM 300) and a closed-chamber (Vapometer™) transepidermal water loss meter.
    Steiner M; Aikman-Green S; Prescott GJ; Dick FD
    Skin Res Technol; 2011 Aug; 17(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 21492241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficient and simple quantification of stratum corneum proteins on tape strippings by infrared densitometry.
    Voegeli R; Heiland J; Doppler S; Rawlings AV; Schreier T
    Skin Res Technol; 2007 Aug; 13(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 17610645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristic differences in barrier and hygroscopic properties between normal and cosmetic dry skin. I. Enhanced barrier analysis with sequential tape-stripping.
    Lu N; Chandar P; Tempesta D; Vincent C; Bajor J; McGuiness H
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2014 Apr; 36(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 24397786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the measuring efficacy of transepidermal water loss of a reasonably priced, portable closed-chamber system device H4500 with that of rather expensive, conventional devices such as Tewameter
    Kikuchi K; Asano M; Tagami H; Kato M; Aiba S
    Skin Res Technol; 2017 Nov; 23(4):597-601. PubMed ID: 28517733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skin type, but neither race nor gender, influence epidermal permeability barrier function.
    Reed JT; Ghadially R; Elias PM
    Arch Dermatol; 1995 Oct; 131(10):1134-8. PubMed ID: 7574829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increased basal transepidermal water loss leads to elevation of some but not all stratum corneum serine proteases.
    Voegeli R; Rawlings AV; Doppler S; Schreier T
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2008 Dec; 30(6):435-42. PubMed ID: 19099544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acute barrier disruption by adhesive tapes is influenced by pressure, time and anatomical location: integrity and cohesion assessed by sequential tape stripping. A randomized, controlled study.
    Breternitz M; Flach M; Prässler J; Elsner P; Fluhr JW
    Br J Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 156(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 17223861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) in cats with experimental skin barrier dysfunction using a closed chamber system.
    Momota Y; Shimada K; Gin A; Matsubara T; Azakami D; Ishioka K; Nakamura Y; Sako T
    Vet Dermatol; 2016 Oct; 27(5):428-e110. PubMed ID: 27492205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation in barrier impairment and inflammation of human skin as determined by sodium lauryl sulphate penetration rate.
    de Jongh CM; Jakasa I; Verberk MM; Kezic S
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):651-7. PubMed ID: 16536807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.