These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17374293)

  • 1. Evidence based medicine, systematic reviews and meta-analysis of literature: a powerful tool for the practising doctor.
    Anwar S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2007 Mar; 17(3):123-4. PubMed ID: 17374293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
    Leibovici L; Reeves D
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2005 Nov; 56(5):803-4. PubMed ID: 16166177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Green S
    Singapore Med J; 2005 Jun; 46(6):270-3; quiz 274. PubMed ID: 15902354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Akobeng AK
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Aug; 90(8):845-8. PubMed ID: 16040886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appraising systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Bigby M; Williams H
    Arch Dermatol; 2003 Jun; 139(6):795-8. PubMed ID: 12810513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 4. Assessing heterogeneity of primary studies in systematic reviews and whether to combine their results.
    Hatala R; Keitz S; Wyer P; Guyatt G;
    CMAJ; 2005 Mar; 172(5):661-5. PubMed ID: 15738493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Getting to grips with systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Davies HT; Crombie IK
    Hosp Med; 1998 Dec; 59(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 10696361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests.
    Halligan S
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Sep; 60(9):977-9. PubMed ID: 16124979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finding and appraising systematic reviews of clinical interventions: critical skills for evidence-based practice.
    Melnyk BM
    Pediatr Nurs; 2003; 29(2):147-9, 125. PubMed ID: 12723829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses "For Dummies".
    Biondi-Zoccai GG; Abbate A; Sheiban I
    EuroIntervention; 2009 Aug; 5(3):289-91. PubMed ID: 19736151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?].
    Antes G; von Elm E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Aug; 134(33):1619. PubMed ID: 19650021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perils of systematic reviews.
    Lang A; Edwards N
    CMAJ; 2005 Mar; 172(7):855; author reply 855-6. PubMed ID: 15795389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others.
    PLoS Medicine Editors
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e147. PubMed ID: 17388685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Qualitative methods: systematic reviews in qualitative health-care research as a basis for evidence-based practice].
    Hasseler M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2007 May; 69(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17582547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of evidence-based medicine and meta-analytic reviews in migraine.
    Haag G
    Cephalalgia; 2007 Jul; 27(7):862-3; author reply 863. PubMed ID: 17598773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.