190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17374468)
1. MR imaging of claustrophobic patients in an open 1.0T scanner: motion artifacts and patient acceptability compared with closed bore magnets.
Bangard C; Paszek J; Berg F; Eyl G; Kessler J; Lackner K; Gossmann A
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Oct; 64(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 17374468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Tolerance of magnetic resonance imaging in children and adolescents performed in a 1.5 Tesla MR scanner with an open design].
Adamietz B; Cavallaro A; Radkow T; Alibek S; Holter W; Bautz WA; Staatz G
Rofo; 2007 Aug; 179(8):826-31. PubMed ID: 17577870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using intranasal midazolam spray to prevent claustrophobia induced by MR imaging.
Hollenhorst J; Münte S; Friedrich L; Heine J; Leuwer M; Becker H; Piepenbrock S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):865-8. PubMed ID: 11264066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduction of claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: methods and design of the "CLAUSTRO" randomized controlled trial.
Enders J; Zimmermann E; Rief M; Martus P; Klingebiel R; Asbach P; Klessen C; Diederichs G; Bengner T; Teichgräber U; Hamm B; Dewey M
BMC Med Imaging; 2011 Feb; 11():4. PubMed ID: 21310075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicenter trial: comparison of two different formulations and application systems of low-dose nasal midazolam for routine magnetic resonance imaging of claustrophobic patients.
Tschirch FT; Suter K; Froehlich JM; Studler U; Nidecker A; Eckhardt B; Beranek-Chiu J; Surber C; Weishaupt D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Oct; 28(4):866-72. PubMed ID: 18821628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: cohort study in over 55,000 patients.
Dewey M; Schink T; Dewey CF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1322-7. PubMed ID: 17969166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wide, short bore magnetic resonance at 1.5 t: reducing the failure rate in claustrophobic patients.
Hunt CH; Wood CP; Lane JI; Bolster BD; Bernstein MA; Witte RJ
Clin Neuroradiol; 2011 Sep; 21(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 21598040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners.
Hailey D
Issues Emerg Health Technol; 2006 Nov; (92):1-4. PubMed ID: 17086657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction of claustrophobia with short-bore versus open magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized controlled trial.
Enders J; Zimmermann E; Rief M; Martus P; Klingebiel R; Asbach P; Klessen C; Diederichs G; Wagner M; Teichgräber U; Bengner T; Hamm B; Dewey M
PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e23494. PubMed ID: 21887259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Psychological behavior of patients in MRI: analysis, proposals for improvement and contribution of open magnet equipment].
Tillier P; Leclet H; Malgouyres A; Laplanche T; Madoux M; Picoult C; Delvalle A; Delforge PM
J Radiol; 1997 Jun; 78(6):433-7. PubMed ID: 9239348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope.
Frauenrath T; Hezel F; Heinrichs U; Kozerke S; Utting JF; Kob M; Butenweg C; Boesiger P; Niendorf T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI of the claustrophobic patient: interventionally configured magnets.
Spouse E; Gedroyc WM
Br J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 73(866):146-51. PubMed ID: 10884726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient preferences for development in MRI scanner design: a survey of claustrophobic patients in a randomized study.
Iwan E; Yang J; Enders J; Napp AE; Rief M; Dewey M
Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1325-1335. PubMed ID: 32876831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Claustrophobia and premature termination of magnetic resonance imaging examinations.
Eshed I; Althoff CE; Hamm B; Hermann KG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Aug; 26(2):401-4. PubMed ID: 17610281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Relation Between Anticipatory Anxiety and Movement During an MR Examination.
Klaming L; van Minde D; Weda H; Nielsen T; Duijm LE
Acad Radiol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1571-8. PubMed ID: 26410806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of motion correction effect and image quality with the periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) (BLADE) and parallel imaging acquisition technique in the upper abdomen.
Hirokawa Y; Isoda H; Maetani YS; Arizono S; Shimada K; Togashi K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Oct; 28(4):957-62. PubMed ID: 18821630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-field open versus short-bore magnetic resonance imaging of the spine: a randomized controlled comparison of image quality.
Enders J; Rief M; Zimmermann E; Asbach P; Diederichs G; Wetz C; Siebert E; Wagner M; Hamm B; Dewey M
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83427. PubMed ID: 24391767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR-guided core biopsy with MR fluoroscopy using a short, wide-bore 1.5-Tesla scanner: feasibility and initial results.
Stattaus J; Maderwald S; Forsting M; Barkhausen J; Ladd ME
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 May; 27(5):1181-7. PubMed ID: 18425833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using an open 0.35 T system.
Klein HM; Meyners W; Neeb B; Labenz J; Truümmler KH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(3):430-4. PubMed ID: 17538291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of the prostate at 3.0T with external phased array coil - preliminary results.
Morakkabati-Spitz N; Bastian PJ; Gieseke J; Träber F; Kuhl CK; Wattjes MP; Müller SC; Schild HH
Eur J Med Res; 2008 Jun; 13(6):287-91. PubMed ID: 18558555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
