123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 173745)
1. Development and evaluation of porous dental implants in miniature swine.
Karagianes MT; Westerman RE; Rasmussen JJ; Lodmell AM
J Dent Res; 1976; 55(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 173745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and evaluation of porous ceramic and titanium alloy dental anchors implanted in miniature swine.
Karagianes MT; Westerman RE; Rasmussen JJ; Marshall RP
J Biomed Mater Res; 1974; 8(4 Pt 2):391-9. PubMed ID: 4412778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical property assessment of bone healing around a titanium-zirconium alloy dental implant.
Anchieta RB; Baldassarri M; Guastaldi F; Tovar N; Janal MN; Gottlow J; Dard M; Jimbo R; Coelho PG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):913-9. PubMed ID: 23527994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A histological evaluation of a functional endosseous, porous-surfaced, titanium alloy dental implant system in the dog.
Deporter DA; Watson PA; Pilliar RM; Howley TP; Winslow J
J Dent Res; 1988 Sep; 67(9):1190-5. PubMed ID: 3166000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A clinical and radiographic assessment of a porous-surfaced, titanium alloy dental implant system in dogs.
Deporter DA; Friedland B; Watson PA; Pilliar RM; Howley TP; Abdulla D; Melcher AH; Smith DC
J Dent Res; 1986 Aug; 65(8):1071-7. PubMed ID: 3525628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Porous titanium endosseous dental implants in Rhesus monkeys: microradiography and histological evaluation.
Young FA; Spector M; Kresch CH
J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 Nov; 13(6):843-56. PubMed ID: 117007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig.
Gottlow J; Dard M; Kjellson F; Obrecht M; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 20586785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peri-implant soft tissues around implants with a modified neck surface. Part 1. Clinical and histometric outcomes: a pilot study in minipigs.
Liñares A; Domken O; Dard M; Blanco J
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Apr; 40(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 23432822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immediate functional loading of single-tooth TIO2 grit-blasted implant restorations: a controlled prospective study in a porcine model. Part I: Clinical outcome.
Bousdras VA; Sindet-Pedersen S; Cunningham JL; Blunn G; Petrie A; Naert IE; Jaecques S; Goodship AE
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):197-206. PubMed ID: 18031441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo evaluation of CSTi dental implants in the presence of ligature-induced peri-implantitis.
Cook SD; Rust-Dawicki AM
J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 8699512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A histological assessment of the initial healing response adjacent to porous-surfaced, titanium alloy dental implants in dogs.
Deporter DA; Watson PA; Pilliar RM; Melcher AH; Winslow J; Howley TP; Hansel P; Maniatopoulos C; Rodriguez A; Abdulla D
J Dent Res; 1986 Aug; 65(8):1064-70. PubMed ID: 3525627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone ingrowth and initial stability of titanium and porous tantalum dental implants: a pilot canine study.
Kim DG; Huja SS; Tee BC; Larsen PE; Kennedy KS; Chien HH; Lee JW; Wen HB
Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 23823737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of partial coating with hydroxyapatite on bone remodeling in relation to porous-coated titanium-alloy dental implants in the dog.
Pilliar RM; Deporter DA; Watson PA; Pharoah M; Chipman M; Valiquette N; Carter S; De Groot K
J Dent Res; 1991 Oct; 70(10):1338-45. PubMed ID: 1658099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrastructural comparisons of ceramic and titanium dental implants in vivo: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Steflik DE; McKinney RV; Koth DL
J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Aug; 23(8):895-909. PubMed ID: 2674150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
Vult von Steyern P
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate functional loading of single-tooth TiO2 grit-blasted implant restoration. A controlled prospective study in a porcine model. Part II: Histology and histomorphometry.
Bousdras VA; Walboomers F; Jansen JA; Cunningham JL; Blunn G; Petrie A; Jaecques S; Naert IE; Sindet-Pedersen S; Goodship AE
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 18031442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of intracrevicular crown margins on gingival health: preliminary findings.
Kancyper SG; Koka S
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):461-5. PubMed ID: 11357072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
