These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17374853)

  • 1. A simulation environment for directional sensing as a phase separation process.
    de Candia A; Gamba A; Cavalli F; Coniglio A; Di Talia S; Bussolino F; Serini G
    Sci STKE; 2007 Mar; 2007(378):pl1. PubMed ID: 17374853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diffusion-limited phase separation in eukaryotic chemotaxis.
    Gamba A; de Candia A; Di Talia S; Coniglio A; Bussolino F; Serini G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Nov; 102(47):16927-32. PubMed ID: 16291809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distinguishing modes of eukaryotic gradient sensing.
    Skupsky R; Losert W; Nossal RJ
    Biophys J; 2005 Oct; 89(4):2806-23. PubMed ID: 16085764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Receptor noise limitations on chemotactic sensing.
    Rappel WJ; Levine H
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Dec; 105(49):19270-5. PubMed ID: 19064934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Receptor noise and directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis.
    Rappel WJ; Levine H
    Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Jun; 100(22):228101. PubMed ID: 18643461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phenomenological approach to eukaryotic chemotactic efficiency.
    Hu B; Fuller D; Loomis WF; Levine H; Rappel WJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2010 Mar; 81(3 Pt 1):031906. PubMed ID: 20365769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chemotaxis assays for eukaryotic cells.
    Zigmond SH; Foxman EF; Segall JE
    Curr Protoc Cell Biol; 2001 May; Chapter 12():Unit 12.1. PubMed ID: 18228315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determining whether observed eukaryotic cell migration indicates chemotactic responsiveness or random chemokinetic motion.
    Szatmary AC; Nossal R
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Jul; 425():103-112. PubMed ID: 28501636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A mathematical model for chemoattractant gradient sensing based on receptor-regulated membrane phospholipid signaling dynamics.
    Narang A; Subramanian KK; Lauffenburger DA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2001 Aug; 29(8):677-91. PubMed ID: 11556724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emergent Collective Chemotaxis without Single-Cell Gradient Sensing.
    Camley BA; Zimmermann J; Levine H; Rappel WJ
    Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Mar; 116(9):098101. PubMed ID: 26991203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulations of chemotaxis and random motility in 2D random porous domains.
    Jabbarzadeh E; Abrams CF
    Bull Math Biol; 2007 Feb; 69(2):747-64. PubMed ID: 17216402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rescaling of Spatio-Temporal Sensing in Eukaryotic Chemotaxis.
    Kamino K; Kondo Y
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164674. PubMed ID: 27792738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling Excitable Dynamics of Chemotactic Networks.
    Bhattacharya S; Iglesias PA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1407():397-415. PubMed ID: 27271916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bacteria push the limits of chemotactic precision to navigate dynamic chemical gradients.
    Brumley DR; Carrara F; Hein AM; Yawata Y; Levin SA; Stocker R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 May; 116(22):10792-10797. PubMed ID: 31097577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A spatially restricted increase in receptor mobility is involved in directional sensing during Dictyostelium discoideum chemotaxis.
    de Keijzer S; Sergé A; van Hemert F; Lommerse PH; Lamers GE; Spaink HP; Schmidt T; Snaar-Jagalska BE
    J Cell Sci; 2008 May; 121(Pt 10):1750-7. PubMed ID: 18469015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How geometry and internal bias affect the accuracy of eukaryotic gradient sensing.
    Hu B; Chen W; Rappel WJ; Levine H
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Feb; 83(2 Pt 1):021917. PubMed ID: 21405873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stochastic signal processing and transduction in chemotactic response of eukaryotic cells.
    Ueda M; Shibata T
    Biophys J; 2007 Jul; 93(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 17416630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mechanistic model for eukaryotic gradient sensing: spontaneous and induced phosphoinositide polarization.
    Subramanian KK; Narang A
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Nov; 231(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 15363929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lattice-Boltzmann model for bacterial chemotaxis.
    Hilpert M
    J Math Biol; 2005 Sep; 51(3):302-32. PubMed ID: 15868199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computational study of the interplay of adhesion and chemotaxis in the cell seeding of tissue engineering scaffolds with incorporated chemoattractants.
    Robu A; Stoicu-Tivadar L; Neagu A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1141. PubMed ID: 23920915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.