BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17374862)

  • 1. Pitfalls in multi-detector row CT colonography: a systematic approach.
    Mang T; Maier A; Plank C; Mueller-Mang C; Herold C; Schima W
    Radiographics; 2007; 27(2):431-54. PubMed ID: 17374862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of colonic lesions and pitfalls in CT colonography: a systematic approach based on morphology, attenuation and mobility.
    Mang T; Gryspeerdt S; Schima W; Lefere P
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1177-86. PubMed ID: 22817848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [CT colonography: pathologic findings and pitfalls].
    Mang T; Graser A; Maier A; Mueller-Mang C; Böhm G; Schima W
    Radiologe; 2008 Feb; 48(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 18210056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions.
    Park SH; Ha HK; Kim MJ; Kim KW; Kim AY; Yang DH; Lee MG; Kim PN; Shin YM; Yang SK; Myung SJ; Min YI
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):495-502. PubMed ID: 15770042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Filling defects at CT colonography: pseudo- and diminutive lesions (the good), polyps (the bad), flat lesions, masses, and carcinomas (the ugly).
    Macari M; Bini EJ; Jacobs SL; Lange N; Lui YW
    Radiographics; 2003; 23(5):1073-91. PubMed ID: 12975501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Missed lesions and false-positive findings on computed-tomographic colonography: a controlled prospective analysis.
    Arnesen RB; Adamsen S; Svendsen LB; Raaschou HO; von Benzon E; Hansen OH
    Endoscopy; 2005 Oct; 37(10):937-44. PubMed ID: 16189765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].
    Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R
    Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.
    Iannaccone R; Laghi A; Catalano C; Brink JA; Mangiapane F; Trenna S; Piacentini F; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 14657315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CT colonography: Protocol optimization with multi-detector row CT--study in an anthropomorphic colon phantom.
    Wessling J; Fischbach R; Meier N; Allkemper T; Klusmeier J; Ludwig K; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):753-9. PubMed ID: 12954895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CT colonography: techniques, indications, findings.
    Mang T; Graser A; Schima W; Maier A
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Mar; 61(3):388-99. PubMed ID: 17224254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging.
    Hara AK; Johnson CD; MacCarty RL; Welch TJ; McCollough CH; Harmsen WS
    Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):461-5. PubMed ID: 11323473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CT colonography interpretation: how to maximize polyp detection and minimize overcalling.
    Park SH; Kim DH
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Mar; 43(3):539-553. PubMed ID: 29404639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
    Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
    Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies.
    Iannaccone R; Catalano C; Mangiapane F; Murakami T; Lamazza A; Fiori E; Schillaci A; Marin D; Nofroni I; Hori M; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):927-37. PubMed ID: 16304113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current role and future potential of computed tomographic colonography for colorectal polyp detection and colon cancer screening-incidental findings.
    Sohns C; Heuser M; Sossalla S; Wolff H; Obenauer S
    Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 18603183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.
    Macari M; Bini EJ; Xue X; Milano A; Katz SS; Resnick D; Chandarana H; Krinsky G; Klingenbeck K; Marshall CH; Megibow AJ
    Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 12147833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [CT colonography --"virtual colonoscopy"--a current review].
    Aschoff AJ; Juchems MS; Weber CK; Brambs HJ
    Z Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 42(10):1199-205. PubMed ID: 15508062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography.
    Yoshida H; Näppi J; MacEneaney P; Rubin DT; Dachman AH
    Radiographics; 2002; 22(4):963-79. PubMed ID: 12110726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficient computerized polyp detection for CT colonography.
    Li H; Pineau B; Santago P
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Mar; 18(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 15645333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection.
    Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S; Taylor SA; Burling D; Roddie M; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
    Gastroenterology; 2006 Dec; 131(6):1690-9. PubMed ID: 17087934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.