These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [The application of medical decision making to the mass screening: the basic principles on ROC analysis]. Tsji I Rinsho Byori; 1990 May; 38(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 2199711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Obuchowski NA Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14519861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests. Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the definition of threshold levels to diagnose coronary artery disease on electrocardiographic stress testing. Part I: The use of ROC curves in diagnostic medicine and electrocardiographic markers of ischaemia. Barnabei L; Marazìa S; De Caterina R J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007 Nov; 8(11):873-81. PubMed ID: 17906471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the definition of threshold levels to diagnose coronary artery disease on electrocardiographic stress testing. Part II: the use of ROC curves in the choice of electrocardiographic stress test markers of ischaemia. Marazìa S; Barnabei L; De Caterina R J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2008 Jan; 9(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18268415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy and ROC Curves with Covariate Adjusted Semiparametric Mixtures. Doebler P; Holling H Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):1084-104. PubMed ID: 25361619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Choosing screening instrument and cut-point on screening instruments. A comparison of methods. Søgaard HJ Scand J Public Health; 2009 Nov; 37(8):872-80. PubMed ID: 19717573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Receiver operating curve, an aid in decision making. Principles and applications illustrated with some examples]. Vinatier D; Monnier JC J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1988; 17(8):981-9. PubMed ID: 3069898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Receiver operating characteristic analysis and the cost--benefit analysis in determination of the optimal cut-off point]. Vránová J; Horák J; Krátká K; Hendrichová M; Kovaírková K Cas Lek Cesk; 2009; 148(9):410-5. PubMed ID: 19899729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Confidence bands for receiver operating characteristic curves. Ma G; Hall WJ Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 8412547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using ROC curves to choose minimally important change thresholds when sensitivity and specificity are valued equally: the forgotten lesson of pythagoras. theoretical considerations and an example application of change in health status. Froud R; Abel G PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114468. PubMed ID: 25474472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparing overnight dexamethasone suppression test, urine free cortisol, and midnight serum cortisol for the initial diagnosis of Cushing' s syndrome]. Tang TJ; Liu YP; Yu YR Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Sep; 44(5):764-8. PubMed ID: 24325108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A principled approach to setting optimal diagnostic thresholds: where ROC and indifference curves meet. Irwin RJ; Irwin TC Eur J Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 22(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 21570638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnostic norms of RAPID neuropsychological battery tests for subjects aged 60 to 89 years with Alzheimer's disease]. Sylvestre G; Chopard G; Tio G; Magnin E; Rumbach L; Vandel P; Galmiche J Rev Neurol (Paris); 2011; 167(6-7):495-504. PubMed ID: 21474155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: practical review for radiologists. Park SH; Goo JM; Jo CH Korean J Radiol; 2004; 5(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 15064554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determining sensitivity of mammography from screening data, cancer incidence, and receiver-operating characteristic curve parameters. Boone JM; Lindfors KK; Seibert JA Med Decis Making; 2002; 22(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 12058780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining a Cut-Off Point for Scores of the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form: Secondary Data Analysis of an Intervention Study in Japan. Nanishi K; Green J; Taguri M; Jimba M PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129698. PubMed ID: 26107382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]