377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17376037)
1. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Sumida Y; Yamamoto H; Nakamura K; Nawata H
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Apr; 22(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 17376037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective comparative study on the acceptability of unsedated transnasal endoscopy in younger versus older patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Motomura Y; Matsui N; Kubokawa M; Kimura M; Ouchi J; Honda K; Endo S; Nakamura K; Takayanagi R
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Oct; 42(9):965-8. PubMed ID: 18622302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope.
Zaman A; Hahn M; Hapke R; Knigge K; Fennerty MB; Katon RM
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):279-84. PubMed ID: 10049408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?
Birkner B; Fritz N; Schatke W; Hasford J
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 12929058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective evaluation of a new ultrathin one-plane bending videoendoscope for transnasal EGD: a comparative study on performance and tolerance.
Dumortier J; Josso C; Roman S; Fumex F; Lepilliez V; Prost B; Lot M; Guillaud O; Petit-Laurent F; Lapalus MG; Ponchon T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Jul; 66(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 17591468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Yagi J; Adachi K; Arima N; Tanaka S; Ose T; Azumi T; Sasaki H; Sato M; Kinoshita Y
Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1226-31. PubMed ID: 16329022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endoscopic-guided versus cotton-tipped applicator methods of nasal anesthesia for transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized, prospective, controlled study.
Hu CT
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 May; 103(5):1114-21. PubMed ID: 18445099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility and tolerance of 2-way and 4-way angulation videoscopes for unsedated patients undergoing transnasal EGD in GI cancer screening.
Tatsumi Y; Harada A; Matsumoto T; Tani T; Nishida H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 18279865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Self-training in unsedated transnasal EGD by endoscopists competent in standard peroral EGD: prospective assessment of the learning curve.
Maffei M; Dumortier J; Dumonceau JM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Mar; 67(3):410-8. PubMed ID: 18155215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of thin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Wilkins T; Brewster A; Lammers J
J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):625-9. PubMed ID: 12160501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation.
Thota PN; Zuccaro G; Vargo JJ; Conwell DL; Dumot JA; Xu M
Endoscopy; 2005 Jun; 37(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15933930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unsedated peroral endoscopy with a video ultrathin endoscope: patient acceptance, tolerance, and diagnostic accuracy.
Zaman A; Hapke R; Sahagun G; Katon RM
Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Aug; 93(8):1260-3. PubMed ID: 9707048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective randomized study comparing transnasal and peroral 5-mm ultrathin endoscopy.
Lin LF; Ma KZ; Tu HL
J Formos Med Assoc; 2014 Jun; 113(6):371-6. PubMed ID: 24820633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparision between per-oral and ultrathin transnasal endoscopy in unsedated patients.
Al Karawi MA; Yasawy MI; Sanai FM; Mohammed Ael S
Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2001 Jan; 7(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 19861762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of transnasal small-caliber vs. peroral conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating varices in unsedated cirrhotic patients.
Choe WH; Kim JH; Ko SY; Kwon SY; Kim BK; Rhee KH; Seo TH; Lee TY; Hong SN; Lee SY; Sung IK; Park HS; Shim CS
Endoscopy; 2011 Aug; 43(8):649-56. PubMed ID: 21660907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the effects on cardiopulmonary function of ultrathin transnasal versus normal diameter transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Japan.
Kawai T; Miyazaki I; Yagi K; Kataoka M; Kawakami K; Yamagishi T; Sofuni A; Itoi T; Moriyasu F; Osaka Y; Takagi Y; Aoki T
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007; 54(75):770-4. PubMed ID: 17591059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective comparison between sedated high-definition oral and unsedated ultrathin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the same subjects: pilot study.
Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Hidaka N; Ichise Y; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N
Dig Endosc; 2009 Jan; 21(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 19691797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Prospective study comparing conventional and transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for routine diagnosis].
Krakamp B; Parusel M; Saers T
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jan; 129(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 14724781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current status and evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Tatsumi Y; Harada A; Matsumoto T; Tani T; Nishida H
Dig Endosc; 2009 Jul; 21(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 19691759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
