354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17376614)
21. The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part I. Defining the review.
Levine AM; Heckman JD; Hensinger RN
Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():679-88. PubMed ID: 15116658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Not for your eyes: information concealed through publication bias.
Kittisupamongkol W
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):558; author reply 558-9. PubMed ID: 19217959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Not for your eyes: information concealed through publication bias.
Liesegang TJ; Albert DM; Schachat AP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Nov; 146(5):638-40. PubMed ID: 18984084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Publishing of scientific studies is no longer dependent on considerations of space in medical journals].
Eliasson M
Lakartidningen; 2001 Nov; 98(47):5394. PubMed ID: 11763644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Release of research results to the public].
Rosenberg J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Nov; 171(47):3419. PubMed ID: 19925724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Freedom of expression and editorial independence: Four firings and a Kafkanian process].
Gøtzsche PC
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Apr; 170(18):1537-8. PubMed ID: 18454921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The availability of original data and statistics: an improvement in good publication practice.
Morselli-Labate AM
JOP; 2003 Nov; 4(6):193-9. PubMed ID: 14614199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Will publication bias vanish in the age of online journals?
Berlin JA
Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1992 Jul; Doc No 12():[1337 words; 10 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 1343607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The publication process itself was the major cause of publication bias in genetic epidemiology.
Calnan M; Smith GD; Sterne JA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1312-8. PubMed ID: 17098574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. PURLS--translating research into reality.
Ewigman B; Susman J
J Fam Pract; 2007 Dec; 56(12):981-3. PubMed ID: 18170951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [The reviewers' review].
Rabinerson D; Horowitz E; Peled Y
Harefuah; 2006 Aug; 145(8):587-91, 630. PubMed ID: 16983843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Editorial.
van Hemmen JL
Biol Cybern; 2006 Jan; 94(1):1. PubMed ID: 16365742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Five direct questions to Josef Milerad concerning credibility].
Holmgren PG
Lakartidningen; 2003 Jan; 100(5):346, 349. PubMed ID: 12607383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Double-blind peer review].
Fenyvesi T
Orv Hetil; 2002 Feb; 143(5):245-8. PubMed ID: 11875838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Exploring the relationship between impact factor and manuscript rejection rates in radiologic journals.
Kurmis AP; Kurmis TP
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 16399035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dissemination of research in clinical nursing journals.
Oermann MH; Nordstrom CK; Wilmes NA; Denison D; Webb SA; Featherston DE; Bednarz H; Striz P; Blair DA; Kowalewski K
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Jan; 17(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18171391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prepublication review of medical ethics research: cause for concern.
Landy DC; Coverdale JH; McCullough LB; Sharp RR
Acad Med; 2009 Apr; 84(4):495-7. PubMed ID: 19318788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Lessons learned from the coxibs' ups and downs. The journals must be tougher against referees and authors].
Milerad J
Lakartidningen; 2008 May 21-27; 105(21):1560-1. PubMed ID: 18574991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Disseminating nursing knowledge--a guide to writing for publication.
Happell B
Int J Psychiatr Nurs Res; 2005 May; 10(3):1147-55. PubMed ID: 15960243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
