These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17376721)

  • 1. A simple method to calculate the accessible volume of protein-bound ligands: application for ligand selectivity.
    Hodneland E; Teigen K
    J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Sep; 26(2):429-33. PubMed ID: 17376721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tetrahydrobiopterin binding to aromatic amino acid hydroxylases. Ligand recognition and specificity.
    Teigen K; Dao KK; McKinney JA; Gorren AC; Mayer B; Frøystein NA; Haavik J; Martínez A
    J Med Chem; 2004 Nov; 47(24):5962-71. PubMed ID: 15537351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation of protein binding cavity volume and ligand volume in protein-ligand complexes.
    Saranya N; Selvaraj S
    Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2009 Oct; 19(19):5769-72. PubMed ID: 19706358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
    Najmanovich R; Kurbatova N; Thornton J
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i105-11. PubMed ID: 18689810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Insights into ligand selectivity in nitric oxide synthase isoforms: a molecular dynamics study.
    Aparna V; Desiraju GR; Gopalakrishnan B
    J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Sep; 26(2):457-70. PubMed ID: 17350298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Geometric and chemical patterns of interaction in protein--ligand complexes and their application in docking.
    Moreno E; León K
    Proteins; 2002 Apr; 47(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11870860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Method for comparing the structures of protein ligand-binding sites and application for predicting protein-drug interactions.
    Minai R; Matsuo Y; Onuki H; Hirota H
    Proteins; 2008 Jul; 72(1):367-81. PubMed ID: 18214952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A searchable database for comparing protein-ligand binding sites for the analysis of structure-function relationships.
    Gold ND; Jackson RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):736-42. PubMed ID: 16563004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A common reference framework for analyzing/comparing proteins and ligands. Fingerprints for Ligands and Proteins (FLAP): theory and application.
    Baroni M; Cruciani G; Sciabola S; Perruccio F; Mason JS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):279-94. PubMed ID: 17381166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated prediction of ligand-binding sites in proteins.
    Harris R; Olson AJ; Goodsell DS
    Proteins; 2008 Mar; 70(4):1506-17. PubMed ID: 17910060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fully automated molecular mechanics based induced fit protein-ligand docking method.
    Koska J; Spassov VZ; Maynard AJ; Yan L; Austin N; Flook PK; Venkatachalam CM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1965-73. PubMed ID: 18816046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of receptors with a new negative image: use in molecular docking and lead optimization.
    Oshiro CM; Kuntz ID
    Proteins; 1998 Feb; 30(3):321-36. PubMed ID: 9517547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures.
    Glaser F; Morris RJ; Najmanovich RJ; Laskowski RA; Thornton JM
    Proteins; 2006 Feb; 62(2):479-88. PubMed ID: 16304646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Secbase: database module to retrieve secondary structure elements with ligand binding motifs.
    Koch O; Cole J; Block P; Klebe G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2388-402. PubMed ID: 19807134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Classification and comparison of ligand-binding sites derived from grid-mapped knowledge-based potentials.
    Hoppe C; Steinbeck C; Wohlfahrt G
    J Mol Graph Model; 2006 Mar; 24(5):328-40. PubMed ID: 16260161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calculation of affinities of peptides for proteins.
    Donnini S; Juffer AH
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Feb; 25(3):393-411. PubMed ID: 14696074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structure networks of E. coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase: effects of ligand binding.
    Sathyapriya R; Vishveshwara S
    Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(2):541-50. PubMed ID: 17444518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Insights into ligand selectivity in estrogen receptor isoforms: molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy calculations.
    Zeng J; Li W; Zhao Y; Liu G; Tang Y; Jiang H
    J Phys Chem B; 2008 Mar; 112(9):2719-26. PubMed ID: 18266357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and validation of a novel protein-ligand fingerprint to mine chemogenomic space: application to G protein-coupled receptors and their ligands.
    Weill N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1049-62. PubMed ID: 19301874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Targacept active conformation search: a new method for predicting the conformation of a ligand bound to its protein target.
    Klucik J; Xiao YD; Hammond PS; Harris R; Schmitt JD
    J Med Chem; 2004 Dec; 47(27):6831-9. PubMed ID: 15615532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.