These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17377028)

  • 1. Automated polyp measurement with CT colonography: preliminary observations in a phantom colon model.
    Fletcher JG; Booya F; Melton Z; Johnson K; Guendel L; Schmidt B; McCollough CH; Young B; Fidler JL; Harmsen WS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Apr; 188(4):945-52. PubMed ID: 17377028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: 3D endoluminal measurement with optimized surface-rendering threshold value and automated measurement.
    Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Woo JY; Chung SY; Kim YJ; Han JK; Ha HK
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):157-67. PubMed ID: 18033755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study.
    Taylor SA; Slater A; Halligan S; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME; Demeshski J; Amin H; Burling D
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 17105850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Manual and automated polyp measurement comparison of CT colonography with optical colonoscopy.
    Jeong JY; Kim MJ; Kim SS
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 18206622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
    Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
    Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison.
    Young BM; Fletcher JG; Paulsen SR; Booya F; Johnson CD; Johnson KT; Melton Z; Rodysill D; Mandrekar J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 17179354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protrusion method for automated estimation of polyp size on CT colonography.
    van Wijk C; Florie J; Nio CY; Dekker E; de Vries AH; Venema HW; van Vliet LJ; Stoker J; Vos FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1279-85. PubMed ID: 18430844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography.
    Yeshwant SC; Summers RM; Yao J; Brickman DS; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):802-11. PubMed ID: 17114627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polyp size at CT colonography after electronic subtraction cleansing in an anthropomorphic colon phantom.
    Zalis ME; Perumpillichira JJ; Kim JY; Del Frate C; Magee C; Hahn PF
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 15987967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computed tomographic colonography: automated tool for polyp measurement delivering on patient risk stratification.
    Bielen D; Vanslembrouck R; De Keyzer F; Vandenhout H; Guendel L; Van Cutsem E; Marchal G
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):504-10. PubMed ID: 18664833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CT colonography: determination of optimal CT technique using a novel colon phantom.
    Johnson KT; Johnson CD; Anderson SM; Bruesewitz MR; Mccollough CH
    Abdom Imaging; 2004; 29(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 15290942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens.
    Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Byeon JS; Jo JY; Kim YH; Lee KH; Ha HK; Han JK
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 17507724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography.
    Bethea E; Nwawka OK; Dachman AH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19933648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive deformable model for colonic polyp segmentation and measurement on CT colonography.
    Yao J; Summers RM
    Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1655-64. PubMed ID: 17555247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of different window settings on colon polyp measurements with CT virtual colonoscopy: a phantom study.
    Wu XW; Wang WQ; Xu JM; Liu B
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 21724119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT colonography: effect of colonic distension on polyp measurement accuracy and agreement-in vitro study.
    Taylor S; Slater A; Honeyfield L; Burling D; Halligan S
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):850-9. PubMed ID: 16777559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of polyp distance on CT colonography between supine and prone scans using an automated path-distance measurement tool: correlation with colonoscopy.
    Park HS; Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SG; Han JK; Choi BI
    Abdom Imaging; 2010 Feb; 35(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 19089490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT colonography using 360-degree virtual dissection: a feasibility study.
    Johnson KT; Johnson CD; Fletcher JG; MacCarty RL; Summers RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 16357384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Polyp measurement using CT colonography: agreement with colonoscopy and effect of viewing conditions on interobserver and intraobserver agreement.
    Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor S; Brennand DJ; Altman DG; Bassett P; Atkin W; Bartram CI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1597-604. PubMed ID: 16714648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computed tomography colonography: automated diameter and volume measurement of colonic polyps compared with a manual technique--in vitro study.
    Burling D; Halligan S; Roddie ME; McQuillan J; Honeyfield L; Amin H; Dehmeshki J; Taylor SA; McFarland EG
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(3):387-93. PubMed ID: 15891512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.