108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17377056)
1. Specificity of MR angiography as a confirmatory test for carotid artery stenosis: is it valid?
Layton KF; Huston J; Cloft HJ; Kaufmann TJ; Krecke KN; Kallmes DF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Apr; 188(4):1114-6. PubMed ID: 17377056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Stenosis-occlusion of the carotid bifurcation. Angiography with MR and contrast media versus digital angiography].
Scarabino T; Carriero A; Balzano S; Sciannelli V; Bonomo L; Salvolini U
Radiol Med; 1998 Mar; 95(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9638160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Magnetic resonance angiography with contrast media in the study of carotid arteries].
Catalano C; Laghi A; Pediconi F; Fraioli F; Napoli A; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2001; 101(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 11360754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; Mali WP
Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):677-82. PubMed ID: 12869686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Perioperative evaluation of internal carotid artery stenoses: value of multislab MR angiography].
Vogl TJ; Kutter RW; Schön K; Juergens M; Hepp W; Balzer JO; Steger W; Felix R
Zentralbl Chir; 1996; 121(12):1023-32. PubMed ID: 9092222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography.
Schneider G; Ballarati C; Grazioli L; Manfredi R; Thurnher S; Kroencke TJ; Taupitz M; Merlino B; Bonomo L; Shen N; Pirovano G; Kirchin MA; Spinazzi A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1020-32. PubMed ID: 17896354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Chiras J; Dormont D; Marsault C
Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 14563902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; van der Graaf Y
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Review of source images is necessary for the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for renal artery stenosis.
Wehrschuetz M; Aschauer M; Portugaller H; Stix A; Wehrschuetz-Sigl E; Hausegger K; Ebner F
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2004; 27(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 15383846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-resolution steady state magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: are intravascular agents necessary?: feasibility and preliminary experience with gadobenate dimeglumine.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Kirchin MA; Neira C; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Dec; 44(12):784-92. PubMed ID: 19858728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in the study of the carotid stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
Scarabino T; Carriero A; Giannatempo GM; Marano R; De Matthaeis P; Bonomo L; Salvolini U
J Neuroradiol; 1999 Jun; 26(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 10444932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography, duplex ultrasound examination with surgical and histological findings of atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation disease.
Liberopoulos K; Kaponis A; Kokkinis K; Pagratis N; Nicolakopoulou Z; Douskou M; Stringaris K; Clonaris C; Balas P
Int Angiol; 1996 Jun; 15(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 8803637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of gadodiamide-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
Garovic VD; Achauer MA; Kittner T; Horák D; Sheng R; Stanson AW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Feb; 31(2):390-7. PubMed ID: 20099352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences.
U-King-Im JM; Trivedi R; Cross J; Higgins N; Graves M; Kirkpatrick P; Antoun N; Gillard JH
Clin Radiol; 2004 Apr; 59(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 15041456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Role of 0.5 T magnetic resonance and duplex ultrasonography in the imaging of stenotic and oblitertive changes in the carotid arteries].
Hebrang A; Brinar V; Vidjak V; Grga A; Sarlija M; Sosa T; Tomac S; Drasković J
Lijec Vjesn; 2002 May; 124(5):129-33. PubMed ID: 12152411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of classic 2D time-of-flight MR angiography in the depiction of severe carotid stenosis.
DeMarco JK; Huston J; Bernstein MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3):787-93. PubMed ID: 15333371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the carotid artery at 1.0 Tesla compared to i.a. DSA: is the method suitable for the diagnosis of carotid stenosis?].
Oberholzer K; Kreitner KF; Kalden P; Pitton M; Requardt M; Thelen M
Rofo; 2001 Apr; 173(4):350-5. PubMed ID: 11367845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Korn A; Bender B; Brodoefel H; Hauser TK; Danz S; Ernemann U; Thomas C
Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
