59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17377059)
1. Neonatal chest computed radiography: image processing and optimal image display.
Don S; Whiting BR; Ellinwood JS; Foos DH; Kronemer KA; Kraus RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Apr; 188(4):1138-44. PubMed ID: 17377059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finding-specific display presets for computed radiography soft-copy reading.
Andriole KP; Gould RG; Webb WR
J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10342153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low-dose digital computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging.
Kogutt MS; Jones JP; Perkins DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 3262278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An optimisation strategy in a digital environment applied to neonatal chest imaging.
Hansson J; Båth M; Håkansson M; Grundin H; Bjurklint E; Orvestad P; Kjellström A; Boström H; Jönsson M; Jonsson K; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15933122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of optical unsharp masking and contrast enhancement of low-scatter chest radiographs.
Sorenson JA; Mitchell CR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Aug; 149(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 3496751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing the absorbed dose in analogue radiography of infant chest images by improving the image quality, using image processing techniques.
Karimian A; Yazdani S; Askari MA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):176-9. PubMed ID: 21743073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a low-dose neonatal chest radiographic system.
Burton EM; Kirks DR; Strife JL; Henry GC; Kereiakes JG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Nov; 151(5):999-1002. PubMed ID: 3263032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital chest radiography.
MacMahon H; Doi K
Clin Chest Med; 1991 Mar; 12(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 2009743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Soft copy using image processing in place of hard copy for detection of subtle pulmonary lesions: is it actually cost-effective?
Abe K; Kosuda S; Iwasaki Y; Hama Y; Kaji T; Kusano S; Ozeki Y; Ichihara K
Radiat Med; 2004; 22(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 15648452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A study of optimum radiographic conditions on chest examinations with computed radiology (CR) in conjunction with the offset balance of patient dose and image quality].
Muto H; Mori T; Hayakawa H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 May; 61(6):303-9. PubMed ID: 11431936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Artifacts in chest radiographs with a third-generation computed radiography system.
Volpe JP; Storto ML; Andriole KP; Gamsu G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Mar; 166(3):653-7. PubMed ID: 8623644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A comparison of the monitor and alternator findings of digital thoracic images with the aid of a computer-supported procedure].
Heckermann D; Fink U; Schätzl M; Fink B; Kenn W; Miller P; Pistitsch C; Herrmann K; Reiser M
Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 9711281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
