176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1737725)
1. Multicentre study on antibiotic susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria to cefoperazone-sulbactam and other antimicrobial agents.
Clark RB; Bartelt MA; Chan EL; Dalton HP
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1992 Jan; 29(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 1737725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro activity of cefoperazone/sulbactam and other antimicrobials against anaerobic bacteria.
D'Amato RF; Hochstein L; Frankel H
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1990; 13(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 2331850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro activity of cefoperazone plus sulbactam compared with that of other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria.
Wexler HM; Finegold SM
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1988 Mar; 32(3):403-6. PubMed ID: 3364960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparative in vitro activity of ampicillin, cefoperazone and their combinations with sulbactam, as well as that of other antibiotics against anaerobic organisms].
Rezvan SP; Sidorenko SV; Budanov SV
Antibiot Khimioter; 1995 Apr; 40(4):25-9. PubMed ID: 7654095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Activity of ampicillin/sulbactam, ticarcillin/clavulanate, clarithromycin, and eleven other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria isolated from infections in children.
Citron DM; Goldstein EJ; Kenner MA; Burnham LB; Inderlied CB
Clin Infect Dis; 1995 Jun; 20 Suppl 2():S356-60. PubMed ID: 7548597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro comparison of cefoperazone/sulbactam with selected antimicrobials against 300 bacteroides isolates. Inhibitory activity and time-kill kinetic studies.
Gelfand MS; Grogan JT; Haas MJ
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989; 12(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 2612130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Susceptibilities of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli to thirteen antimicrobials and beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations.
Hill GB; Ayers OM; Everett BQ
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1991 Dec; 28(6):855-67. PubMed ID: 1816182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In-vitro activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam against Bacteroides species.
Souza Dias MB; Jacobus NV; Tally FP
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1986 Oct; 18(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 3021709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative efficacy of cefoperazone, cefoperazone plus sulbactam, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, metronidazole, and penicillin G against anaerobic bacteria in an animal model.
Moody JA; Fasching CE; Sinn LM; Gerding DN; Peterson LR
J Lab Clin Med; 1990 Feb; 115(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 1967626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in Australia.
Chen SC; Gottlieb T; Palmer JM; Morris G; Gilbert GL
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1992 Dec; 30(6):811-20. PubMed ID: 1289355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative in-vitro activity of cefoperazone/sulbactam and 11 other agents against multidrug resistant Bacteroides fragilis group species.
Goldstein EJ; Citron DM
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1996 Oct; 38(4):733-7. PubMed ID: 8937969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam combinations against cefoperazone-resistant clinical bacterial isolates.
Eliopoulos GM; Klimm K; Ferraro MJ; Moellering RC
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989 Jul; 8(7):624-6. PubMed ID: 2506024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro activity of ampicillin plus sulbactam against anaerobes compared to ampicillin and cefoxitin.
Heizmann W; Heilmann F; Werner H
Infection; 1987; 15(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 3692611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Criteria for disk susceptibility tests and quality control guidelines for the cefoperazone-sulbactam combination.
Barry AL; Jones RN
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Jan; 26(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 3343304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The effect of a combination of ampicillin and sulbactam against clinical anaerobic isolates].
Werner H; Heizmann W; Heilmann F
Arzneimittelforschung; 1988 Jul; 38(7):866-8. PubMed ID: 3207432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam combination against gram negative bacilli.
Poudyal N; Gyawali N; Gurung R; Bhattarai NR; Baral R; Khanal B; Shrestha S; Amatya R; Bhattacharya SK
Nepal Med Coll J; 2012 Mar; 14(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 23441486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro activity of beta-lactam drugs and sulbactam against Chlamydia trachomatis.
Segreti J; Kapell KS; Trenholme GM
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992; 15(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 1611854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [In vitro activities of sulopenem, a new parenteral penem, against anaerobes].
Watanabe K; Kato N; Tanaka-Bandoh K; Tanaka Y; Kato H; Ueno K
Jpn J Antibiot; 1996 Apr; 49(4):367-76. PubMed ID: 8786627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of commonly used antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for evaluating susceptibilities of clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli to cefoperazone-sulbactam.
Jean SS; Liao CH; Sheng WH; Lee WS; Hsueh PR
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2017 Aug; 50(4):454-463. PubMed ID: 26454423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In-vitro susceptibility of cefoperazone-susceptible and -resistant gram-negative rods to cefoperazone plus sulbactam, other beta-lactams, aminoglycosides and quinolone.
Chandrasekar PH; Sluchak JA
Infection; 1991; 19(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 2013510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
