These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17377257)
1. Experiences of using the EndoAssist-robot in surgery. Halín N; Loula P; Aarnio P Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 125():161-3. PubMed ID: 17377257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: a pilot study. Wagner AA; Varkarakis IM; Link RE; Sullivan W; Su LM Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16844449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Robotic and telerobotic surgical systems for abdominal surgery]. Córdova Dupeyrat A; Ballantyne GH Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2003; 23(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 12768216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aiono S; Gilbert JM; Soin B; Finlay PA; Gordan A Surg Endosc; 2002 Sep; 16(9):1267-70. PubMed ID: 12235507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control . Kavoussi LR; Moore RG; Adams JB; Partin AW J Urol; 1995 Dec; 154(6):2134-6. PubMed ID: 7500476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The EndoAssist robotic camera holder as an aid to the introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Gilbert JM Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Jul; 91(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 19409150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic versus human camera holding in video-assisted thoracic sympathectomy: a single blind randomized trial of efficacy and safety. Martins Rua JF; Jatene FB; de Campos JR; Monteiro R; Tedde ML; Samano MN; Bernardo WM; Das-Neves-Pereira JC Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Feb; 8(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 19042929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users. Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; de Vries J; Greve J; Bouvy ND Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Jun; 17(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17581459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Use of robotics in laparoscopic urological surgery: state of the art]. Long JA; Descotes JL; Skowron O; Troccaz J; Cinquin P; Boillot B; Terrier N; Rambeaud JJ Prog Urol; 2006 Feb; 16(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 16526532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms. Nguan C; Kwan K; Al Omar M; Beasley KA; Luke PP Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3571-6. PubMed ID: 17594748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial experience with the EndoAssist camera-holding robot in laparoscopic urological surgery. Kommu SS; Rimington P; Anderson C; Rané A J Robot Surg; 2007; 1(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 25484949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. Benway BM; Bhayani SB; Rogers CG; Dulabon LM; Patel MN; Lipkin M; Wang AJ; Stifelman MD J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):866-72. PubMed ID: 19616229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. Payne TN; Dauterive FR J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal dissection: from better views to better outcome. Ng KH; Lim YK; Ho KS; Ooi BS; Eu KW Singapore Med J; 2009 Aug; 50(8):763-7. PubMed ID: 19710972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a surgical robot system for endovascular surgery with augmented reality function. Suzuki N; Hattori A; Suzuki S; Otake Y Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 125():460-3. PubMed ID: 17377326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current status of robot-assisted surgery in urology: a multi-national survey of 297 urologic surgeons. Guru KA; Hussain A; Chandrasekhar R; Piacente P; Hussain A; Chandrasekhar R; Piacente P; Bienko M; Glasgow M; Underwood W; Wilding G; Mohler JL; Menon M; Peabody JO Can J Urol; 2009 Aug; 16(4):4736-41; discussion 4741. PubMed ID: 19671225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short-term impact of a robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy 'mini-residency' experience on postgraduate urologists' practice patterns. McDougall EM; Corica FA; Chou DS; Abdelshehid CS; Uribe CA; Stoliar G; Sala LG; Khonsari SS; Eichel L; Boker JR; Ahlering TE; Clayman RV Int J Med Robot; 2006 Mar; 2(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 17520615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A robotic camera for laparoscopic surgery: conception and experimental results. Begin E; Gagner M; Hurteau R; de Santis S; Pomp A Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1995 Feb; 5(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 7735544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of task performance of the camera-holder robots EndoAssist and Aesop. Nebot PB; Jain Y; Haylett K; Stone R; McCloy R Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2003 Oct; 13(5):334-8. PubMed ID: 14571171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]