These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17377646)

  • 1. Impact of pharmaceutical industry versus university sponsorship on survey response: a randomized trial among Canadian hepatitis C care providers.
    Myers RP; Shaheen AA; Lee SS
    Can J Gastroenterol; 2007 Mar; 21(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 17377646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: what does the literature say?
    Lexchin J
    CMAJ; 1993 Nov; 149(10):1401-7. PubMed ID: 8221424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "But doctors do it...": nurses' views of gifts and information from the pharmaceutical industry.
    Jutel A; Menkes DB
    Ann Pharmacother; 2009 Jun; 43(6):1057-63. PubMed ID: 19470854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. National survey on the attitudes of Canadian physicians towards drug-detailing by pharmaceutical representatives.
    Strang D; Gagnon M; Molloy W; Bedard M; Darzins P; Etchells E; Davidson W
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1996 Dec; 29(8):474-8. PubMed ID: 12380577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does sponsorship matter in patient satisfaction surveys? A randomized trial.
    Etter JF; Perneger TV; Rougemont A
    Med Care; 1996 Apr; 34(4):327-35. PubMed ID: 8606557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.
    McMahon SR; Iwamoto M; Massoudi MS; Yusuf HR; Stevenson JM; David F; Chu SY; Pickering LK
    Pediatrics; 2003 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):e299-303. PubMed ID: 12671142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does growing up with a physician influence the ethics of medical students' relationships with the pharmaceutical industry? The cases of the US and Poland.
    Makowska M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Aug; 18(1):49. PubMed ID: 28797266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Industry sponsorship and research outcome.
    Lundh A; Sismondo S; Lexchin J; Busuioc OA; Bero L
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Dec; 12():MR000033. PubMed ID: 23235689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effects of a mandatory guideline that prohibit hospital doctors from accepting any form of benefits in any form from the pharmaceutical industry].
    Gundermann C; Meier-Hellmann A; Bauer M; Hartmann M
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 May; 135(3):67-70. PubMed ID: 20077378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of prenotification on the response rate of a postal survey of emergency physicians: a randomised, controlled, assessor-blind trial.
    Hickey M; McIntyre L; Taljaard M; Abdulaziz K; Yadav K; Hickey C; Perry JJ
    BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e052843. PubMed ID: 34556517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining Internet-Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial.
    Ernst SA; Brand T; Lhachimi SK; Zeeb H
    Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 53(2):879-895. PubMed ID: 28217941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of tracking responses and the day of mailing on physician survey response rate: three randomized trials.
    Akl EA; Gaddam S; Mustafa R; Wilson MC; Symons A; Grifasi A; McGuigan D; Schünemann HJ
    PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16942. PubMed ID: 21373197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Is it pertinent to investigate the relations between physicians and the drug industry].
    Moliner J; Mozota J; Abad JM; Casaña L; Júdez D; Rabanaque MJ
    Rev Calid Asist; 2009 Apr; 24(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 19426930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alcohol industry sponsorship and hazardous drinking in UK university students who play sport.
    O'Brien KS; Ferris J; Greenlees I; Jowett S; Rhind D; Cook PA; Kypri K
    Addiction; 2014 Oct; 109(10):1647-54. PubMed ID: 24825409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial.
    Hocking JS; Lim MS; Read T; Hellard M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 May; 59(5):521-4. PubMed ID: 16632141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry generally and sales representatives specifically and their association with physicians' attitudes and prescribing habits: a systematic review.
    Fickweiler F; Fickweiler W; Urbach E
    BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016408. PubMed ID: 28963287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty.
    Akl EA; Maroun N; Klocke RA; Montori V; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 58(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 15862729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Different response rates in a trial of two envelop styles in mail survey research.
    Asch DA; Christakis NA
    Epidemiology; 1994 May; 5(3):364-5. PubMed ID: 8038256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interactions of staff and residents with pharmaceutical industry: a survey of psychiatric training program policies.
    Chakrabarti A; Fleisher WP; Staley D; Calhoun L
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 2002 Dec; 35(8 Suppl.):541-6. PubMed ID: 15015500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors associated with physicians' reliance on pharmaceutical sales representatives.
    Anderson BL; Silverman GK; Loewenstein GF; Zinberg S; Schulkin J
    Acad Med; 2009 Aug; 84(8):994-1002. PubMed ID: 19638762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.