These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17377702)

  • 1. [Study of three dimensional reconstruction and visualization of human mandible].
    Li NY; Ma YB; Gu F; Wang Y; Shan T; Yu SC; Li XZ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2007 Feb; 16(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 17377702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Construction of a three-dimensional mandible model containing teeth based on the Virtual Chinese Human data].
    Zhang Y; Tang L; Chen M
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2008 Aug; 28(8):1449-51. PubMed ID: 18753084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Study of digital visual mandible].
    Li NY; Ma YB; Cu F; Wang Y; Shan T; Li XZ
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 25(1):83-5, 89. PubMed ID: 17375587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Reconstruction of the mandibular model using a three-dimensional laser scanner].
    Zhang MC; Liao JM; Li M; Zhao WD
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2004 Jul; 24(7):756-7. PubMed ID: 15257894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A virtual deformable mandible model used for reconstruction computer aided design of large mandibular defects].
    Chen Q; Cai Z; Peng X; Wang Y; Liu H; Guo C
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jul; 49(7):414-20. PubMed ID: 25257455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Three-dimensional design of surgery for mandibular retrusion].
    Ke ZY; Yin XM; Jiao PF; Bi ZY; Dai JX; Huang WH
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Jun; 30(6):1279-81. PubMed ID: 20584657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraoral Digital Impressions for Virtual Occlusal Records: Section Quantity and Dimensions.
    Solaberrieta E; Garmendia A; Brizuela A; Otegi JR; Pradies G; Szentpétery A
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7173824. PubMed ID: 26881226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional virtual technology in reconstruction of mandibular defect including condyle using double-barrel vascularized fibula flap.
    Wang WH; Zhu J; Deng JY; Xia B; Xu B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 41(5):417-22. PubMed ID: 23218981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional error of selective laser sintering, three-dimensional printing and PolyJet models in the reproduction of mandibular anatomy.
    Ibrahim D; Broilo TL; Heitz C; de Oliveira MG; de Oliveira HW; Nobre SM; Dos Santos Filho JH; Silva DN
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 37(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 19056288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Error analysis of a CAD/CAM method for unidirectional mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia.
    Sun H; Li B; Zhao Z; Zhang L; Shen SG; Wang X
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):892-7. PubMed ID: 23583007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures.
    Kim TS; Caruso JM; Christensen H; Torabinejad M
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1191-4. PubMed ID: 20630297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques.
    Hazeveld A; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 24373661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Xiangdong QI; Limin MA; Shizhen Z
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of a stable reference area for superimposing mandibular digital models.
    An K; Jang I; Choi DS; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Cha BK
    J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Nov; 76(6):508-19. PubMed ID: 26250456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Genial Spinal Canal.
    Passia N; Oberbillig F; Goulioumis V; Naumova EA; Kern M; Arnold W
    Clin Anat; 2020 Oct; 33(7):1102-1108. PubMed ID: 31688952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Location of the mandibular canal and the topography of its neurovascular structures.
    Kim ST; Hu KS; Song WC; Kang MK; Park HD; Kim HJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):936-9. PubMed ID: 19461335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element (FE) modeling of the mandible: from geometric model to tetrahedral volumetric mesh.
    Zhao L; Han H; Patel PK; Widera GE; Harris GF
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():593-6. PubMed ID: 15458158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Revised Approach for Mandibular Reconstruction With the Vascularized Iliac Crest Flap Using Virtual Surgical Planning and Surgical Navigation.
    Yu Y; Zhang WB; Wang Y; Liu XJ; Guo CB; Peng X
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 74(6):1285.e1-1285.e11. PubMed ID: 27019415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the potential of automatic segmentation of the mandibular canal using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Gerlach NL; Meijer GJ; Kroon DJ; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 52(9):838-44. PubMed ID: 25156043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.