These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17377703)

  • 1. [Stress on class tunnel restorations of the first mandibular molar].
    Tao L; Xu X; Ning F
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2007 Feb; 16(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 17377703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effects of different class II cavity designs on stresses in restoration].
    Xu X; Sun Z; Tao L; Xiong H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(6):446-8. PubMed ID: 12641960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Heat Transfer and Thermal Stress Analysis of a Mandibular Molar Tooth Restored by Different Indirect Restorations Using a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Method.
    Çelik Köycü B; İmirzalıoğlu P
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Jul; 26(5):460-473. PubMed ID: 26618930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tunnel or saucer-shaped restorations: a survival analysis.
    Hörsted-Bindslev P; Heyde-Petersen B; Simonsen P; Baelum V
    Clin Oral Investig; 2005 Dec; 9(4):233-8. PubMed ID: 16133496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth.
    Hasselrot L
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8291027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial.
    Kinomoto Y; Inoue Y; Ebisu S
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 15478486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment of proximal caries lesions by tunnel restorations.
    Wiegand A; Attin T
    Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1461-7. PubMed ID: 17320944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations.
    Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 12797575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration.
    Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Pintado MR; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 15134941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One-year retrospective clinical evaluation of hybrid composite restorations placed in United Kingdom general practices.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ; Bell TJ; Healy A; Mark B; McBirnie R; Osborne-Smith KL
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 12066649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tunnel restorations versus class II restorations for small proximal lesions: a comparison of tooth strengths.
    Papa J; Cain C; Messer HH; Wilson PR
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Feb; 24(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 8511270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of quantity of resin, C-factor, and geometry on resin composite polymerization shrinkage stress in Class V restorations.
    Borges AL; Borges AB; Xavier TA; Bottino MC; Platt JA
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 23786611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of temperature and humidity on post-gel shrinkage, cusp deformation, bond strength and shrinkage stress - Construction of a chamber to simulate the oral environment.
    Bicalho AA; de Souza SJ; de Rosatto CM; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1523-32. PubMed ID: 26518338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Aboush YE; Torabzadeh H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 11203844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.