These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17377731)

  • 1. Evaluating environmental sustainability: an integration of multiple-criteria decision-making and fuzzy logic.
    Liu KF
    Environ Manage; 2007 May; 39(5):721-36. PubMed ID: 17377731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fuzzy decision analysis for integrated environmental vulnerability assessment of the mid-Atlantic Region.
    Tran LT; Knight CG; O'Neill RV; Smith ER; Riitters KH; Wickham J
    Environ Manage; 2002 Jun; 29(6):845-59. PubMed ID: 11992175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A fuzzy logic expert system for evaluating policy progress towards sustainability goals.
    Cisneros-Montemayor AM; Singh GG; Cheung WWL
    Ambio; 2018 Sep; 47(5):595-607. PubMed ID: 29249050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analyzing the Status of Sustainable Development in the Manufacturing Sector Using Multi-Expert Multi-Criteria Fuzzy Decision-Making and Integrated Triple Bottom Lines.
    Hendiani S; Liao H; Bagherpour M; Tvaronavičienė M; Banaitis A; Antucheviciene J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(11):. PubMed ID: 32471107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sustainability prioritization of sewage sludge to energy scenarios with hybrid-data consideration: a fuzzy decision-making framework based on full consistency method and fusion ranking model.
    Tang C; Xu D; Chen N
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(5):5548-5565. PubMed ID: 32970262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.
    Afrasiabi A; Tavana M; Di Caprio D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(25):37291-37314. PubMed ID: 35050472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making approach for industrial green engineering.
    Chiou HK; Tzeng GH
    Environ Manage; 2002 Dec; 30(6):816-30. PubMed ID: 12402097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A sustainable forest management criteria and indicators assessment using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.
    Bayram BÇ
    Environ Monit Assess; 2021 Jun; 193(7):425. PubMed ID: 34132901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Green Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Artificial Neural Networks.
    Gegovska T; Koker R; Cakar T
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2020; 2020():8811834. PubMed ID: 33082775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effective allocation of resources in water pollution treatment alternatives: a multi-stage gray group decision-making method based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets.
    Wang J; Qian W; Du J; Liu Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(3):3173-3186. PubMed ID: 31838682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A fuzzy logic-based tool to assess beef cattle ranching sustainability in complex environmental systems.
    Santos SA; de Lima HP; Massruhá SMFS; de Abreu UGP; Tomás WM; Salis SM; Cardoso EL; de Oliveira MD; Soares MTS; Dos Santos A; de Oliveira LOF; Calheiros DF; Crispim SMA; Soriano BMA; Amâncio COG; Nunes AP; Pellegrin LA
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Aug; 198(Pt 2):95-106. PubMed ID: 28511067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fuzzy rule-based models for decision support in ecosystem management.
    Adriaenssens V; De Baets B; Goethals PL; De Pauw N
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Feb; 319(1-3):1-12. PubMed ID: 14967497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing coastal reclamation suitability based on a fuzzy-AHP comprehensive evaluation framework: A case study of Lianyungang, China.
    Feng L; Zhu X; Sun X
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2014 Dec; 89(1-2):102-111. PubMed ID: 25455377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM-based CODAS approach for locating an authorized dismantling center: a case study of Istanbul.
    Karagoz S; Deveci M; Simic V; Aydin N; Bolukbas U
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jun; 38(6):660-672. PubMed ID: 31969081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas.
    Eseoglu G; Yapsakli K; Tozan H; Vayvay O
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8800. PubMed ID: 35614159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Integrated MCDM Model for Conveyor Equipment Evaluation and Selection in an FMC Based on a Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS in the Presence of Vagueness.
    Nguyen HT; Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Rifai AP; Aoyama H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153222. PubMed ID: 27070543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tackling Complex Emergency Response Solutions Evaluation Problems in Sustainable Development by Fuzzy Group Decision Making Approaches with Considering Decision Hesitancy and Prioritization among Assessing Criteria.
    Qi XW; Zhang JL; Zhao SP; Liang CY
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Oct; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 28974045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the sustainability of big data centers using the analytic network process and fuzzy TOPSIS.
    Zhang Q; Yang S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(14):17913-17927. PubMed ID: 33410015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of health-care waste disposal methods using a VIKOR-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method.
    Liu HC; Wu J; Li P
    Waste Manag; 2013 Dec; 33(12):2744-51. PubMed ID: 24011433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of interval-valued fuzzy GRA with SERVPERF based on subjective and objective weights for evaluation of airline service quality: A case study of Korea low-cost carriers.
    Lee S; Kang D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0219739. PubMed ID: 31386667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.